Core77 x Luxion Party at IDSA Boston 2012

Core77_Luxion_IDSA_1.JPG

Core77 and Luxion teamed up to host a Boston blowout at this year’s IDSA International Conference. Our annual IDSA conference parties have been the stuff of legend and as you can tell from the above picture with Offsite organizer Jordan Nollman, our Star Trek friend from Sunset Cafe, and Conference Chair Charles Austen Angell, this year was no exception.

Bluegrass rockers Jimmy Ryan & Mark Spencer kept the party going with their upbeat mix of rockabilly and classic boot stompers. IDSA members shared beers and relaxed after a night of studio visits and mixers hosted by Continuum, IDEO, Sprout, Radius, Manta, Altitude and more! Conference Chair Charles Austen Angell even celebrated his birthday at Atwood’s Tavern with the whole IDSA Conference!

Core77_Luxion_IDSA_2b.JPG

Core77_Luxion_IDSA_2c.JPG

Core77_Luxion_IDSA_3a.JPG

As conference goers started filling up the bar and backyard patio at Atwood’s Tavern, we realized that we’d have to annex the bar nextdoor for overfill. Sunset Cafe graciously hosted us, treating us to table-top beer towers and pizza. Sonny, the bar dog, serenaded the crowd while our Trekkie friend took the time for photo ops.

Core77_Luxion_IDSA_10.JPG

Core77_Luxion_IDSA_12.JPG

Core77_Luxion_IDSA_14.jpg

Core77_Luxion_IDSA_20.jpg

(more…)


Richer Poorer Union Thread

Stars, stripes and digi camo in the latest collection of American-made socks

Richer Poorer Union Thread

While the warmth of summer is still keeping most of our ankles out in the open air, the bold stylings of Richer Poorer’s latest line has us looking forward to socks. Dropping this week to coincide with Capsule Las Vegas, the seven-style Union Thread collection introduces a handful of…

Continue Reading…


More Adam Buxton Brilliance

Comedian Adam Buxton is currently presenting the TV version of music video night Bug on Sky Atlantic, and as part of the show he’s been creating some bespoke promos of his own in collaboration with his favourite directors. We recently featured a film by Dougal Wilson and Buxton on a promos round-up, and here’s two more from the comedian: first up, a psychedelic animated adventure created with the Layzell Bros…


The promo accompanies the Tiny Tim track Livin’ In The Sunlight, Lovin’ In The Moonlight, a song originally featured in a 1930 Maurice Chevalier film, The Big Pond, and stars Buxton as a hallucinating out-of-work animator.

Next up is an ode to, um, sushi, written and performed by Buxton himself, with the video shot by David Wilson. Buxton describes the promo as follows: “We set out to make what is hopefully the most offensively racist and sexist video about sushi ever, with a kind of lardy, hairy, Ewok man in the middle.”

Both videos were produced by Colonel Blimp. More on Buxton’s Sky Atlantic show is here.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

Trinidadian architect Tara Keens Douglas presented a series of carnival costumes made from folded paper and twisted rope as part of her masters thesis.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

The Ecstatic Spaces collection is based on the process of transformation that masqueraders experience at a carnival.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

The four costumes are described as four operations: appropriation, exaggeration, submersion and sublimation.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

Keens Douglas says the costumes are “ephemeral architecture”, adding: “They temporally distort the true nature of the body.”

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

Last year she completed her Master of Architecture thesis at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

Other fashion collections we’ve recently featured on Dezeen include dresses inspired by a Japanese novel and garments made from translucent lambskin.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

See all our stories about fashion »

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

Here’s some more information from the designer:


The work represented here is derived from the Waterloo Master of Architecture thesis ‘Ecstatic Spaces’ by Tara Keens-Douglas. Originally from Trinidad, Tara Keens-Douglas received her Master’s degree from the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada in 2011. Her design work was selected for joint exhibition at the Cambridge Galleries in Ontario, Canada.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

Her thesis work studies the relationship of Trinidad’s carnival festival to personal architecture and the spaces they create and occupy. It challenges architectural representation through costume design that embodies the transformative experiences of the masquerader. The costumes are referred to as four operations of appropriation, exaggeration, submersion and sublimation. They are all tools of communication, a medium between body and space. Each transforms the body during carnival, through its disguise and extension. Together they produce an out of body experience.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

Trinidad’s Carnival was introduced by the French and adapted by Trinidad’s diverse population. Trinidadian’s reinvent and revitalize new forms within carnival: it is uniquely theirs. The participants revel in a festival that is not only excessive, but also temporal, occurring outside of ordinary life. In the festival, everything is upside down and inside out. This inversion is expressed in laughter.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

The people of Trinidad communicate in the playful and sensuous nature of the carnival costume. They mock the seriousness of the political world, rejecting state and class. A medium for humor, the costumes stand in for the bodies we do not have; ambivalently, they both degrade and regenerate. Costumed, Carnival embraces laughter and the grotesque, and gives the community identity.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

The chaos of parade, music, and dance fuses the body with the costume, transforming the individual, freeing him from inhibitions. The fusion of body and Carnival costume tells the untold story of the masquerader. The architecture of costume serves its wearers. Its significance lies in its affirmation of identity, while accommodating an emotional and sensuous experience.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

New techniques, shifts in the local economy, and changing concepts of culture, have in turn, redeveloped the Carnival costume. New designs – departures – stand out. Carnival pushes this very idea. Over the years, costumes challenge the officials and the onlookers. They are daring, controversial, and crude. It is the contemporary female costume in Carnival that most challenges convention now. It is why I chose the female form as my muse for my costume designs, using the ornament of costume to amplify the grotesque. I began with the costume titled ‘appropriation’, a dragon costume for the contemporary female Carnival. It mimics the aggressive nature of the dragon costume and merges it with the highly sexualized female body in carnival. I used abstract forms that evoked the dragon.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

Working with my hands, I mold and manipulate, pushing, pulling, creasing, and tearing to reach the desired volume. I compose based on a repetition of units. Three of these units make up a three-dimensional ‘spiked’ form. I approach its design with a sense of blind faith. Piece by piece, I assemble the modular ‘spike’ around the female form. I imagine what the series of spikes could represent, a twist in the dragon’s tail, the ridge on his back.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

I variously scaled ‘spikes’ to draw attention to areas of the body used to communicate, whether as threat device or sexual lure. The completed costume is an appropriation of the dragon, made to suit the carnival female and their changing culture. Both the costume and the process of making it were transformative.

Ecstatic Spaces by Tara Keens Douglas

The four costume designs are grotesque, making extreme exaggerations and unfathomable representations of the body, violating the idealized, classical body. The costumes are an ephemeral architecture – fragile and mobile. They temporally distort the true nature of the body, transforming the wearer, perhaps disclosing new natures. They make a new “facade”, or emphasize one already in play. They are, in a way, architecture of the persona.

The post Ecstatic Spaces by
Tara Keens Douglas
appeared first on Dezeen.

The Design of Design Patents, Part 2: The Price of Protection, by Michael Hages

Loewy2.jpg*The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the view of his firm or its clients.

In the first article of this series, we introduced the idea that valuable design patents are something that designers can, and should, work to obtain. We also explored the misconception that design patents are inherently narrow or easy to get around and discovered exactly where the holes in such a belief lie. In this article, we’ll look at how the cost of design patents affects how people perceive their value and what the actual cost of a good design patent strategy should be.

Misconception 2: Design patents are cheap (and why it’s a good thing that this is wrong)

Anyone who has participated on both the design and utility side of the patent application process can see a difference in how the applications get written and assembled. Both the amount of information exchanged and the time taken for preparing a utility patent are much greater than when dealing with a design patent application. Of course, this time is ultimately reflected in the cost of the application, which in the case of a utility, is typically expected to be in the range of $8,000 to $12,000. That, however, is for a single application that may only cover limited aspects of a product. Simply comparing this to the cost for a design application, which can be between $2,000-3,000, shows a notable difference in the expected amount of time usually spent on these two types of applications.

Adequately covering a new and innovative product on the utility side, however, can often involve multiple applications, adding up to sometimes more than $50,000 for a single product (and that’s just to file the applications). Most of the time, when working on the design side, only a single application is filed. The Patent Office might require an applicant to split up the application into separate applications that cover what they determine to be different designs, even if only slightly different. Such a requirement only incrementally increases the cost, which ultimately pales in comparison to the total on the utility side.

This vast difference in cost certainly makes design patents look cheap. Simply because there isn’t much actual legal writing involved, design patents shouldn’t cost as much as utility patents. But, they shouldn’t be viewed as cheap. There are probably a lot of designers who wouldn’t view $3,000 as cheap, but the overall notion, especially from the perspective of someone paying $50,000 to begin the utility patent process, is that design patents comparatively lack value. It’s also worth mentioning that there can also be a significant additional cost in actually getting a utility patent through the Patent Office. The cost of so-called patent prosecution can add another $10,000 to $20,000 to the cost of a utility application itself (it can be more in extreme cases) and is also less expensive when dealing with design patents.

(more…)


Miscellaneous papers can wreak havoc with your filing system

Managing paper is often a reason I’m called in to help clients. They are usually frustrated by growing paper piles and, almost always, there is a Miscellaneous (MISC) file among the piles. The MISC file is like a junk drawer for a diverse set of papers they’re not sure how to process.

When files are labeled MISC, it’s difficult to figure out (and find) what is inside because the label is broad and encompasses several categories. This will ultimately slow you down when you need to retrieve information, and on days when things are hectic and particularly fast-paced, you can quickly get frustrated. So, why are MISC files created so often? Perhaps because it’s easier to put everything in one general file than making more complex decisions. Figuring out what to do takes time and some decision making, like what to keep and what to recycle/shred, what categories to use, and making room for new items.

To banish that catch-all file and make deciding what to do a little easier, follow these steps. Of course, not every system will work for everyone, but this three-step process will at least get you thinking about creating one that will work for you.

  1. Ask yourself a few questions. Before you decide where to put a specific piece of paper, decide if you actually need that piece of paper. Can you access it in some other way (internet, a digital scanned copy)? How long has it been since you last referred to that document? Does the responsibility of storing it still lie with you or does it now belong to someone else or another department?
  2. Determine the next action needed. Once you’ve decided which papers you need to keep, these papers will need a permanent living space (just like everything else in your home or office). Think about the next action that needs to be taken so that you can determine the paper’s category. Do you need to make a follow up call to a client? Pay a bill? Edit a manuscript? Then, you could have folders with the following labels:
    • Current bills
    • To call or Today’s tasks (or add client call to your to-do list instead)
    • Editing or the title of the manuscript

    The names you use will be particular to you and the typical documents you need to keep. Also, consider looking at your existing categories to see if you can find the right match for your papers (then you wouldn’t have to make a new folder or come up with a new category at all).

  3. Use easy-to-remember categories. Putting things in categories actually helps us to remember those items better. This means you’ll be more efficient at finding the files you want when they are grouped by a specific topic that makes sense to you. For instance, you might have a Utilities category in which you put the current telephone, gas, electric, and water bills. Or, a “Blogging” folder for articles that inspire your future posts.

You can really simplify the filing process by removing your MISC folder from your paper filing system. You’ll find that there really isn’t a need for a general file once you have determined the correct category for your papers. And, keep in mind, the less you print, the less you have to file and retrieve. When possible, use online bookmarking tools (like Delicious and Instapaper) and/or tag your documents and save them to your hard drive and/or cloud server so you can find them easily.

Like this site? Buy Erin Rooney Doland’s Unclutter Your Life in One Week from Amazon.com today.


Why Does Paris Look Like Paris and New York Like New York?

ParisNonParis.png

When you think back on all the cities you’ve traveled to, what images come to mind? Do you think about people you met or the people you traveled with? The music you heard, food you ate, art you saw or souvenirs you bought? As a lover of architecture both personally and professionally (I’m also an editor at The Architect’s Newspaper), my mind automatically flips through a slideshow of building facades, city streets and the unifying architectural details I saw repeatedly over the course of my trip. If this is how you remember cities, too, it turns out you and I aren’t the only ones.

Recently, a group of researchers from Carnegie Mellon and the Laboratoire d’Informatique de l’École Normale Supérieure in Paris (also known as the Computer Science department at ENS) developed a software that mines visual data from Google Street View images of cities and defines the most prominent characteristics found in each place. From a bank of 40,000 images, the software worked overnight with 150 processors to detect more than 250 million defining characteristic of twelve major cities, including Barcelona, London, New York and Paris.

The program works by comparing all the images and defining the individual details that differentiate images of one city from another. After some heavy duty computing, the software defined Paris by images of gilded ironwork on balconies, balustrades and cornices over doors and windows as well as the city’s signature street signs. It was a little trickier to visually define US cities, which are younger and stylistically less unified than older cities in Europe or Asia, but the software came up with bay windows for San Francisco and fire escapes for New York.

You can learn more from a quick how-to video on the software or test your street smarts by taking the Paris-NonParis test, in which you look at 100 images and take a stab at which city you think they’re from (hint: only 50 of them are from Paris).

According to the researchers:

Given a large repository of geotagged imagery, we seek to automatically find visual elements, e.g. windows, balconies, and street signs, that are most distinctive for a certain geo-spatial area, for example the city of Paris. This is a tremendously difficult task as the visual features distinguishing architectural elements of different places can be very subtle. In addition, we face a hard search problem: given all possible patches in all images, which of them are both frequently occurring and geographically informative? To address these issues, we propose to use a discriminative clustering approach able to take into account the weak geographic supervision. We show that geographically representative image elements can be discovered automatically from Google Street View imagery in a discriminative manner. We demonstrate that these elements are visually interpretable and perceptually geo-informative. The discovered visual elements can also support a variety of computational geography tasks, such as mapping architectural correspondences and influences within and across cities, finding representative elements at different geo-spatial scales, and geographically-informed image retrieval.

See also: David Stolarsky’s “18,154 Consistent And Regular Views Of New York” for Art Hack Day at 319 Scholes

(more…)


Jambox Remix

More than 100 different color combinations now available

Jambox Remix

When something is modular and colorful creative-types can’t help but mix and match parts. As fans of the Jawbone’s Jambox since its launch, we have a few here at CH HQ and are guilty of dismantling and reassembling them in different colorways. With today’s launch of Remix, any Jambox…

Continue Reading…


Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

Shimmering aluminium panels are ridged like the top surfaces of bricks on the exterior of this country house in upstate New York by architects Grzywinski + Pons (+ slideshow).

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

Ipe wood screens and painted yellow doors contrast with the silvery cladding, which subtly reflects the colours of the surrounding woodland.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

The wooden screens fasten across glass doors and windows to secure the two-storey residence when it is unoccupied.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

The house was designed as a weekend retreat and is accompanied by a smaller building that can be privately rented or used as a family guesthouse.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

Only the master bedroom is located on the top floor of the house and opens out onto a large balcony.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

Other American houses on Dezeen include a writer’s retreat elsewhere in New York and a 4.5 metre-wide house in Los Angeles.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

See more stories about holiday homes »

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

Photography is by Floto + Warner.

Here’s some text from Grzywinski + Pons:


Dutchess House No. 1

When Grzywinski + Pons was commissioned to design this house we were excited by a brief and directive from the client that was very specific programmatically and where budget had primacy but open to whatever form that might manifest from our process in addressing their requests.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

The house was conceived as country home initially used as a complement to and reprieve from their apartment in the city that could ultimately evolve into a primary residence. They wanted a detached cottage or guest house that could accommodate their visiting elderly parents for extended stays from the west coast and be available to rent out on a nightly basis at their discretion to help defray costs.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

Another request was to create a place that felt very open to it’s beautiful surroundings yet could be battened down and secured during any extended periods when it was unoccupied. Furthermore, the client – when anticipating stays in the house alone – requested we create a master bedroom suite that allowed unfettered access to the outdoors (both physically and visually) from a safe “perch” when the ground floor was secured for the night.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

We paid special attention to sightlines, exposures, seasonal variations in the quality and direction of light and the flow and integration of interior and exterior spaces.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

We also were focused on making the home very sustainable and energy efficient – while this informed the design of the home in a significant way we didn’t want the house and cottage to wear their green credentials on their sleeve as an aesthetic.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

The house was built with ICFs, strategically glazed with low-e assemblies and clad in high albedo mill finish aluminum. We designed deep eaves into the largest expanses of glass based on our solar studies.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

The home and cottage ended up being so well insulated that we needed to specify an EVR unit for fresh air exchange. An on demand hot water system precludes any wasted energy on water heaters when the home is unoccupied and also heats the home through a hydronic radiant slab. Low flow fixtures, dual flush toilets, LED lighting, high efficiency appliances and sustainably grown lumber were all specified and employed.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

We wanted to make sure that the house felt very warm and happy – a truly convivial environment – while unabashedly modern and durable. The natural environment is the star of the show and each room or interior space is predicated on celebrating that. Even the exterior cladding, specified for performance – matte aluminum and ipe – was designed to amplify the progression of hues both throughout the day and throughout the seasons.

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

Architects: Grzywinski+Pons
Project completed: 2012
Location: Millerton, NY
Design Team: Matthew Grzywinski, Amador Pons

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

Ground floor detail plan 1 – click above for larger image

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

Ground floor detail plan 2 – click above for larger image

Dutchess House No. 1 by Grzywinski + Pons

First floor detail plan – click above for larger image

The post Dutchess House No. 1
by Grzywinski + Pons
appeared first on Dezeen.

Twist and Clean

The Hula Washer promises to keep you fit and svelte as you wash your clothes. Not only do you save time and money, but the concept also keeps your waistline under control. The energy you use to spin the Hula Washer, like a Hula Hoop is used to clean the clothes loaded into the washer segment. Add clothes and washing liquid to the hollow centre of the ring and then start to spin. The only thing problem I see it that it looks convenient for small clothes like socks and hankies, nothing more.

Hula is a 2012 Electrolux Design Lab Entry.

Designer: Sang-soon Lee



Yanko Design
Timeless Designs – Explore wonderful concepts from around the world!
Yanko Design Store – We are about more than just concepts. See what’s hot at the YD Store!
(Twist and Clean was originally posted on Yanko Design)

Related posts:

  1. Keep Feet Clean
  2. How Clean Is Your Bedroom Air
  3. Balls Clean My Air, Seriously!