Get Me Out Of Here

Jeremy Leslie thinks that Disappear Here, James Brown and Peaches Geldof’s new venture into youth publishing has a great name. Unfortunately that isn’t enough to detract from its empty editorial and confused design…

As a fully paid up member of the magazine obsessives club it takes a lot for me to dismiss a new magazine. So I surprised myself when I did just that about a new title announced at the end of last year.

Disappear Here arrives courtesy of Peaches Geldof (C-list celebrity daughter of Sir Bob) and James Brown (the man who bought us Loaded magazine back in 1994). I mentioned its launch in a brief post on my magCulture blog late last year. While admiring the name of their magazine (more of which later), I slipped easily into the assumption that any magazine from those two would be disappoint­ing. How could 19-year-old Peaches and the quietly fading Brown create anything genuinely innovative? I added that their description of the project (“a magazine about music and fashion and every­thing you love”) made it sound hackneyed.

The one thing I did like was that title. Naming a new magazine is always one of the toughest creative tasks, and while not the most easily presented or descriptive name for a magazine, Disappear Here is a great title. It sets a distinctive conceptual tone for the project and demonstrates that the people behind it understand what a magazine can be – a world apart, a place to escape to. The best magazines offer their readers a unique world to submerge themselves in, be it the sheer escapism of Vogue, the intel­lec­tual stimulus of The New Yorker, the conceptual experiment of inde­pend­ents like Kasino A4, or indeed the full-on hedonism of Brown’s Loaded. Disappear Here tells you little beyond that, and is a clumsy phrase for the designer to build a logo from. But a clever name nonetheless, a good start.

In response to my post, Brown, not unreasonably, suggested I should check out their pilot issue before passing further comment. Meanwhile, to my amusement, a quote from my post (“what a great name for a magazine”) appeared on the magazine’s website.

It was left to art director Stuart Tolley to mail me a copy of the pilot issue. A quick flick later and two things were clear. Firstly, my initial cynicism was correctly placed. Disappear Here is a mess of a magazine, featuring the worst sort of self-regarding insular content completely lacking the vital glue of an editorial concept to hold it together. It lurches from Geldof inter­viewing Vivienne Westwood to reportage from a Norway rock festival via a column from Tony Benn and endless pictures of teenagers snogging. The lead feature of the pilot issue is that most tired magazine cliché – 50 Things We Love, number 42 of which is “Silky knickers in lurid colours”, because, “We’ve got lots of them. Literally millions of pairs of knickers. Where do they all come from? Sweat­shops full of children of course, but you know what we mean, right?” Believe me, this is not a world many will want to escape to.

Secondly, and in response to the confusion of the content, Tolley has had great fun playing with this editorial mess. Too much fun. One of the basic premises of editorial design is that content and presentation should reflect one another and he has risen to this task without fear. Every page looks different, borrowing from early i-D, RayGun and a thousand other indie mags. This is editorial and design chaos with none of the refresh­ing novelty of its sources.

Geldof and Brown seem to be under the impression they’ve created a super-cool youth fanzine, when the actual result is a half-baked melange of ideas that could have been knocked out down the pub. There probably is a decent magazine somewhere within their thinking, a magazine that might reunite a young audience with print, but with this pilot edition they’ve singularly failed to prove it. 

This article appears in the February issue of CR. Jeremy Leslie is executive creative director of John Brown, co-curator of the Colophon independent magazine festival and author of the magCulture.com blog

Esquire’s New Cover Star: Morph


Following the recent death of the wonderful TV presenter and artist Tony Hart, one of his most famous creations, Morph, is to appear on the cover of the March issue of Esquire. And he finally has some clothes

It’s actually Morph’s 30th birthday, which makes this writer feel extremely old. To celebrate, Esquire and a team from Aardman Animations, which brought the original Morph to life on Take Hart, have given the little feller a wardrobe by the likes of Burberry, Gucci and Prada – in plasticine, of course.

Morph features on the subscriber cover and, with his old mate Chaz, on inside pages (Esquire art director: David McKendrick).

Apparently, it took Aardman’s Peter Lord and team 8 weeks to create the outfits and scenes.

“I must say the Esquire shoot was a hoot. The joke is that Morph’s wardrobe – which is approximately one-twelfth scale – was almost certainly worth twice as much as my wardrobe, Lord says. “Morph is really tiny – only about 12 or 13 centimetres tall. I couldn’t imagine how you could make clothes so tiny and then fit them around Morph’s body – which isn’t exactly slim – and still have them look good.”

This isn’t the first time one of Aardman’s characters has crossed over into the world of high fashion – last year we reported on Wallace and Gromit starring in a Harvey Nichols campaign. What next, Shaun the Sheep for Baaahberry? (Sorry)

The issue is out February 5. All images (C) Aardman 2008 for Esquire magazine

Electronic Examiner c. 1981

This clip from a 1981 news broadcast from San Francisco’s KRON channel heralds the arrival of the consumption of news via home computer. The San Francisco Examiner, along with eight other US newspapers, was able to deliver the text of each daily edition via a basic computer network. David Cole, a staffer on the SFE, conveys what this breakthrough was like and, interestingly, hints at some issues that still occupy media companies today: “This is an experiment. We’re trying to figure out what it’s going to mean to us, as editors and reporters and what it means to the home user. And we’re not in it to make money, we’re probably not going to lose a lot, but we aren’t going to make much either.” (Via: Design Observer).

CR Feb Issue


CR’s February cover, illustrated by Letman

The February issue of Creative Review is out on Wednesday 21 January, with features on Luke Hayman, Letman, Indian advertising, The Guardian’s new home, The Elms Lesters Painting Rooms and more…

Our Work section features first sight of the logo for Condé Nast’s forthcoming Love magazine, Dougal Wilson’s puppet-tastic video for Coldplay and Spin’s identity for Argentina’s PROA gallery

Features include an interview with Pentagram’s Luke Hayman in which he reveals the secret of his success – CR, of course (ahem)

A profile of Job Wouters, aka Letman, hand-lettering artist extraordinaire and brother of our former Creative Future, Roel. Job also designed our cover this month, which carries on our theme of basing the design around a listing of that month’s content. Also, our guest typeface this issue (as seen here) is Dessau Pro Stenzil Variant by Gábor Kóthay, distributed by Fountain

How The Guardian’s editorial design has grown, almost accidentally, into an all-encompassing visual language for the paper, which now includes signage at its new home (by Cartlidge Levene)

A look at why The Elms Lesters Painting Rooms, shunned by the mainstream gallery world, has given street art a home

And an examination of the role that advertising can play in ensuring that India doesn’t repeat the mistakes of the west in the face of growing consumerism

Plus, in Crit, we have all the usual discussion and comment including a look at advertising’s love of pain

And the all-important findings of our research into studio snacking and listening habits

Plus, subscribers will notice a change to Monograph this month. We are now using this rather beautiful Stephen Sultry Grey cover stock

Inside this month we feature Paul Belford’s collection of vintage Bollywood posters

And here’s the back cover with a key to the various pens that Letman used to design the front

It’s out on Wednesday 21 January. Enjoy.

Guardian Gives Shape To Obama’s Words

Expect Obama-mania in the media over the next couple of days as Inauguration Day approaches – ‘the nearest America will come to a coronation,’ as one wag has put it. In one of the more CR-relevant tie-ins, tomorrow’s Guardian G2 section will feature excerpts from a selection of speeches by Almost President Obama as interpreted by a mixture of designers and illustrators


Introducing it all is this cover by David Carson


Contributors inside include Sean Freeman


Peter Horridge


Jonathan Barnbrook


Mario Hugo


And Paula Scher

There is also to be a contribution from Alan Kitching but, as I write this, G2 art director Richard Turley has just emailed to say “we just received the Alan Kitching but it’s still wet (!) so can’t be scanned….. not sure what we’re going to do about it yet other than send the work experience into the toilets to hold it under the hairdryer… guess that demonstrates the kind of timescales we operate to in newspapers.” So that one may not appear.

Under Turley and deputy art director Jo Cochrane, the use of illustration in The Guardian’s G2 section has been a consistent highlight – not just for special projects such as this Christmas cover by Yulia Brodskaya

but also in the regular contributor pages. David Foldvari’s dark, sometimes menacing style is the perfect counterpart for the black humour of the regular Charlie Brooker column on Mondays

while the likes of David Hughes, Belle Mellor and a host of other illustrators – some established, some new – set G2 very much apart from its broadsheet competitors.

The New York Times has long been lauded for its use of illustration on the Op Ed pages. The Guardian’s G2 section deserves to be placed up alongside it for its consistent excellence.

Update: Looks like the work experience person did a good job with the dryer – here’s the Alan Kitching illustration in today’s paper

And the G2 cover

Kander Shoots Obama’s People


Photo: Kira Pollack

This Sunday, the New York Times Magazine will publish Obama’s People, a special edition featuring 52 full-page photographs of the new power elite, photographed by Nadav Kander

In an editor’s letter on the NYT website, Gerald Marzorati explains that the project was inspired by a 1976 edition of Rolling Stone which featured 73 portraits of the then-power elite, shot by Richard Avedon. “We, like many of our readers — like most Americans, it seems fair to say — sensed something eventful and potentially far-reaching about the election and the challenges the new president and his team would immediately face. Why not take account of this with portraits of those whose character and temperament and bearing may well prove consequential in the coming months and years?” Marzorati says.

So the magazine’s editor of photography Kathy Ryan (below, right. Photo: Kira Pollack) commissioned Kander, with whom she has worked extensively, to take the portraits in mid-December and earlier this month in Chicago and Washington. The results will make up the largest collection of images by one photographer that the New York Times has ever published.

The images, and behind-the-scenes shots are also available to view at the NYT website.


Photo: Felicity McCabe


Photograph: Arianne Teeple

Rubbish green policy

We received not one but two of these 4-inch wheely bins in the CR office today. The tiny bins came in direct mailers from one of London’s free newspapers, thelondonpaper, as part of a campaign conceived to promote the fact that the paper is “always printed on 100% recycled paper with ink that’s kinder to the environment”…

Having an environmentally friendly printing policy is, of course, highly commendable – although pretty much all of newsprint paper these days is made from recycled paper. According to Friends of the Earth, wood fibre (necessary to make paper) can normally only be recycled up to five times due to damage experienced to the fibre. So, unless the quantity of newsprint used each year worldwide declines to reflect the lost/damaged fibre, a certain amount of new (virgin) fibre is required each year globally, even if individual newsprint mills may continue to use 100% recycled fibre.

Bearing this in mind, thelondonpaper’s environmental fanfare seems a little ridiculous. Printing huge quantities of newspaper week in, week out is never going to be an environmentally friendly endeavour. And besides, isn’t adding who-knows-how-many of these promotional plastic bins to the world’s stock of non-biodegradable polypropylene matter simply adding insult to injury?

New Comment Policy On CR Blog

Or, Death To Trolls…

So far, on CR Blog, we have limited the moderation to anything that is openly offensive or potentially libellous. However, of late the quality of the debate here has been suffering from a rash of comments that really contribute nothing.

We don’t mind swearing, but to post a comment along the lines of “shit. the lot of them” or “that’s crap” does nothing to generate the type of informed debate that we hope the site can foster. We are all for criticism but, if you don’t like something, we want to know WHY.

So, as from now, we are instigating a more active moderation policy. Anything that, in the opinion of the moderators, is pointlessly abusive or adds nothing to the debate will be deleted.

And, as a reminder, here are the other criteria that we would ask you to observe:

“CR encourages comments to be short and to the point. As a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.”

Thanks