Puff Adder by Patrice Taravella and Terry de Waal

A timber tunnel shaped like a snake – with a bulge to suggest an ingested mouse – provides perfect conditions for growing lilies on a farm in the Western Cape of South Africa.

The Puff adder by Patrice Taravella and Terry de Waal

The snake-like Puff Adder structure at Babylonstoren Farm, designed by French architect Patrice Taravella and engineer Terry de Waal, is made from balau wood strips on steel frames and winds along a stream  surrounded by olive and eucalyptus trees.

The Puff adder by Patrice Taravella and Terry de Waal

The slats reduce direct sunlight while allowing air to circulate, creating an ideal environment for native South African clivia lilies, which flower in spring.

The Puff adder by Patrice Taravella and Terry de Waal

The tunnel features a bulge nicknamed ‘the mouse’, a visual pun suggesting what the snake might have eaten for lunch.

The Puff Adder by Patrice Taravella  and Terry de Waal

Photographs are by Alain Proust.

The Puff adder by Patrice Taravella and Terry de Waal

Here’s some more information from the designers:


A shaded walk was recently created on Babylonstoren farm for a collection of clivias. These famous indigenous lilies of South Africa flower during Spring which starts in September. The walk meanders next to a stream emanating in the Simonsberg and slithers through wild olives and eucalyptus trees.

The Puff adder by Patrice Taravella and Terry de Waal

The structure of balau slats on steel frames eliminates about 40% of sunlight but allows a free flow of air: ideal for clivias. The bulge in the structure is known as “the mouse”, as it resembles a rodent in the belly of a snake. The structure was designed by Patrice Taravella and engineered by Terry de Waal.

The Puff Adder by Patrice Taravella  and Terry de Waal

Babylonstoren garden is situated in the Cape Winelands and is open to the public. The clivia collection edges a huge formal vegetable and fruit garden which supplies the farm hotel and Babel restaurant with fresh produce daily.

The post Puff Adder by Patrice Taravella
and Terry de Waal
appeared first on Dezeen.

Rem Koolhaas tipped to be director of next Venice Architecture Biennale

Rem Koolhaas

Dezeen Wire: Rem Koolhaas of OMA is tipped to be director of the next Venice Architecture Biennale in 2014. Among those speculating on Twitter was assistant director for the 2012 biennale Kieran Long, who tweeted “it’s certain to be Rem Koolhaas next time. Done deal say my sources.”

Koolhaas was awarded the Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement at the 2010 biennale.

The rumours coincide with the news that Koolhaas will receive the Jencks Award at the RIBA in November.

Portrait is by Dominik Gigler.

See all our stories about OMA »
See all our stories about the Venice Architecture Biennale 2012 »

The post Rem Koolhaas tipped to be director of
next Venice Architecture Biennale
appeared first on Dezeen.

Venice Architecture Biennale “cannot get any worse,” says Wolf D. Prix

Wolf D. Prix

Dezeen Wire: architect Wolf D. Prix of Coop Himmelb(l)au has launched a scathing attack on the Venice Architecture Biennale, claiming it’s “no longer about lively discussion and criticism of topics in contemporary architecture” but places too much importance on celebrity.

In a statement sent as a press release entitled The Banal, he says that participating architects are “playing” while the profession is “sinking into powerlessness and irrelevance” at the hands of politicians, investors and bureaucrats who “have been deciding on our built environment for a long time now”.

Prix would have preferred a “look behind the scenes at the decision-making, instead of boring exhibitions”, giving controversial plans to redevelop Stuttgart train station, the spiralling cost of Herzog & de Meuron’s Elbphilharmonie concert hall and political disputes about mosques and minarets as examples of good topics.

He also criticises biennale director David Chipperfield for encouraging cooperation with the authorities rather than resistance, calling his theme of Common Ground a “compromise” that “cannot get any worse”.

Assistant director of the biennale Kieran Long responded by tweeting “I think if Wolf Prix hates you, you are doing something right,” while Charles Holland of London architects FAT, who created a Museum of Copying for the Aersenale exhibition, tweeted “Wolf Prix say hello to black kettle. Kettle, say hi to famous pot Wolf Prix.”

In his opening speech at the press conference on Monday Chipperfield claimed “this biennale isn’t an X Factor of who’s hot right now”, a sentiment also expressed in our movie interview in which he urges the profession to turn away from iconic one-off projects like opera houses, theatres and museums, and address “the 99.99% of the rest of the world which architects are not dealing with” before they’re relegated to being “urban decorators.”

See all our stories about the Venice Architecture Biennale »
See all our stories about Coop Himmelb(l)au »

Portrait is by Elfie Semotan.

Here’s the full statement from Wolf D. Prix:


The Banal

Praise be to Nero’s Neptune.
The Titanic sails at dawn.
And everybody’s shouting
“Which Side Are You on?”
(Bob Dylan: “Desolation Row”, 1966)

If one did not know that the media constantly exaggerates, one could almost conclude – as the Süddeutsche Zeitung has – that the Venice Biennale of Architecture really is the world’s most important architecture exhibition.

However, I believe that the word “exhibition” is not intended to describe an exhibition in this case, rather that the notion only designates the event per se. In other words an industry meeting, like a product fair. Other critics fail to even question the purpose of the exhibition, rather they immediately conclude that the coming together, the meeting, the networking is the key aspect. That’s that!

I would like to maintain at this juncture that the meaning of the Venice Biennale of Architecture for theoretical arguments has been increasingly losing significance since its beginnings with the Strada Novissima by Paolo Portoghesi in 1980. Even the personal significance for the participants is very low when compared to the Art Biennale. So let us not deny the truth. This event is an expensive danse macabre. In a city of plunder (an exhibition of plunder) hordes of tourists (architects) roll along broken infrastructure in order to satisfy their petit bourgeois desire for education (in the case of the architects: vanity, envy, schadenfreude, suspicions). Even the glamour that the visitors are supposed to feel is staid and faked by the media for whom a star architect is like a film star.

In truth it is all hollow, arduous, exhausting, bleak and boring. It is no longer about lively discussion and criticism of topics in contemporary architecture, but rather about empty, conservative and perhaps populist shells that are charged with feigned meaning. What a great Architecture Biennale it would have been had they established forums and put out themes which would have provided a chance to look behind the scenes at the decision-making, instead of boring exhibitions. Take for example the dispute about the train station in Stuttgart. The reasons for the cost explosion for prominent buildings such as, for example, the Elbe Philharmonic Hall. The political arguments about mosques and minarets, in other words the disputes about the localisation of an idea. Why the market for single-family homes in the USA has collapsed and how power politics is conducted through settlement architecture. These topics would be worthy of discussion – not who is and who is not a star architect.

However, instead of that we face: “People Meet in Architecture” and now “Common Ground”. In other words: compromise. It cannot get any worse!

This situation conjures an image of the Venetian carnival – one can imagine all the architects in Pierrot costumes surrounded by masked critics and dancing the Dance Banale, or, even better, the architects are playing on a sinking gondola like erstwhile the orchestra on the Titanic playing their last song, while outside in the real world our leaky trade is sinking into powerlessness and irrelevance. This is because politicians and project managers, investors and bureaucrats have been deciding on our built environment for a long time now. Not the architects.

While in Russia artists are stubbornly resisting the authoritarian regime, the current director of the Architecture Biennale considers these characteristics to be obstacles for our profession and he explains in an interview that space must be taken from the genius. One would have to show him Pussy Riots in order for him to finally understand our society.

Furthermore, I consider that the Venice Biennale of Architecture needs to be reorganised.

Wolf D. Prix / COOP HIMMELB(L)AU

The post Venice Architecture Biennale “cannot
get any worse,” says Wolf D. Prix
appeared first on Dezeen.

21 Cake Headquarters Architecture

L’ agence People’s Architecture Office a imaginé le design du siège de 21 Cake, une franchise de cuisine reconnue en Chine en imaginant une interaction avec l’installation de verres colorés selon les trois couleurs primaires. Un rendu coloré et bien pensé à découvrir dans la suite de l’article.


21 Cake Headquarters Architecture11
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture9
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture8
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture7
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture6
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture5
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture4
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture3
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture2
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture1
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture
21 Cake Headquarters Architecture10

Elbphilharmonie by Herzog & de Meuron at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

Elbphilharmonie by Herzog & de Meuron

Architects Herzog & de Meuron have carved some of the spaces of their unfinished Elbphilharmonie concert hall from layered blocks of foam and suspended them from the ceiling of the Arsenale for the Venice Architecture Biennale.

Elbphilharmonie by Herzog & de Meuron

Visitors are able to peer inside each model to give them a sense of what the rooms will be like once complete.

Above: photograph is c/o Herzog & de Meuron

The architects explain that difficulties in the planning and building process caused construction of the building to temporarily cease in November 2011, so they chose to present it at the biennale to draw attention to these issues and their effect on the architectural industry.

Above: photograph is c/o Herzog & de Meuron

Uncensored newspaper reports line the walls behind the models and chronologically chart the public opinion and debate surrounding the project.

Above: photograph is c/o Herzog & de Meuron

Now scheduled for completion in 2014, the Elbphilharmonie will accommodate three concert halls inside an existing brick warehouse in Hamburg with a huge new glass structure over its roof.

Above: photograph is c/o Herzog & de Meuron

See visualisations of the proposed Elbphilharmonie here and see images of the building under construction here.

Elbphilharmonie by Herzog & de Meuron

See all our stories about Herzog & de Meuron »

Elbphilharmonie by Herzog & de Meuron

See all our stories about the Venice Architecture Biennale 2012 »

Elbphilharmonie by Herzog & de Meuron

Here’s some more information from Herzog & de Meuron:


Contribution to La Biennale di Venezia. 13. Mostra Internazionale di Architettura: Common Ground
Herzog & de Meuron. Elbphilharmonie – The construction site as a common ground of diverging interests.

The history of the Elbphilharmonie is an almost incredible example of a bottom-up democratic project, informed with euphoric energy, driven by architectural beauty, cultural-political vision, and civic pride. This energy exhausted itself in the face of exploding building costs and seemingly endless prolonged construction, culminating in a temporary building stop in November 2011. The large-scale construction site increasingly mutated into a battlefield involving the three main players: the client (the City of Hamburg, and its representative ReGe), the general contractor, and the architect/general planner. Ideally, the construction site of every building project is a platform of interaction that engages these three main forces; in this case, it relentlessly exposed conflicting interests and requirements. The story of the Elbphilharmonie provides, as an example, an insight into the extremes that mark the reality of planning and building today.

Our installation for the Biennale presents the project without taking a stand or attempting to analyze the complexities of its evolution. The only comments provided are uncensored press reports, demonstrating that this project has been a focus of public interest and ongoing debate for years. The installation includes representations of the complex building services; camera shots walking through the construction site; and large-scale models, whose spatial and physical presence represent what the architects wished and still wish to foreground: architecture.

Arsenale Corderie, Venice, Italy
Exhibition 29 August – 25 November 2012

The post Elbphilharmonie by Herzog & de Meuron
at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012
appeared first on Dezeen.

Competition: five copies of Why We Build by Rowan Moore to give away

Competition: five copies of Why We Build to give away

Competition: architecture critic Rowan Moore‘s new book Why We Build is released today, and we are publishing an extract as well as giving readers the chance to win one of five copies.

Competition: five copies of Why We Build to give away

Moore examines what inspires architects to build and what emotions shape their users experiences of them, using case studies such Dubai’s Palm Jumeirah island (above) and New York’s High Line development (below).

Competition: five copies of Why We Build to give away

The hardback book retails at £20 and is published by Macmillan.

To enter this competition email your name, age, gender, occupation, and delivery address and telephone number to competitions@dezeen.com with “Why We Build” in the subject line. We won’t pass your information on to anyone else; we just want to know a little about our readers.

Read our privacy policy here.

Competition closes 27 September 2012. Five winners will be selected at random and notified by email. Winners’ names will be published in a future edition of our Dezeenmail newsletter and at the top of this page. Dezeen competitions are international and entries are accepted from readers in any country.

Read an extract from the first chapter of the book “Desire shapes space, and space shapes desires” below:


Architecture starts with desire on the part of its makers, whether for security, or grandeur, or shelter, or rootedness. Built, it influences the emotions of those who experience and use it, whose desires continue to shape and change it. Desire and emotion are overlapping concepts, but if ‘desire’ is active, directed towards real and imagined ends, and if ‘emotion’ implies greater passivity, describing the ways in which we are moved, architecture is engaged with both. Buildings are intermediaries in the reciprocation between the hopes and intentions of people, in the present and the past. They are the mineral interval between the thoughts and actions that make them and the thoughts and actions that inhabit them.

Most people know that buildings are not purely functional, that there is an intangible something about them that has to do with emotion. Most towns or cities have towers or monuments of no special purpose, or public buildings and private houses whose volumes are larger than strictly necessary, and structures with daring cantilevers or spans that are not perfectly efficient. These cities have ornament and sculpture, also buildings whose construction drove their owners to ruin, or which never served their intended purpose, or which outlived their use but are preserved. A home might contain pictures, mementoes, vases, antiques, light shades not chosen for their function alone. It might be a centuries-old house with obsolete standards of thermal insulation, draught exclusion, and damp control, for which nonetheless its owner pays a premium. If Dubai seems preposterous, it is only an extreme version of the decisions people make in extending, building, remaking, or furnishing their own homes, which are rarely guided by pure function. If it attracts attention, it is because it presents to us urges that are familiar, but in a way that seems uncontrolled.

But to say that there is emotion in architecture is a bare beginning. What forms does it take, and by what weird alchemy do cold materials absorb and emit feeling? What transformations happen? Whose feelings matter more: the clients’, the architects’, the builders’, or the users’, those of a commissioning government or corporation, or of casual passers-by? What complexities, indirections, and unintended consequences arise, and what epiphanies and farce? Building projects are usually justified with reference to measurable of finance and use. When we acknowledge the intangible it is often with vague words, such as ‘inspiring’, or perhaps ‘beautiful’, an honourable word which nonetheless leaves much unsaid, such as beautiful to whom, and in what way? We might resort to personal taste, or to some idea of what is good or bad derived from aesthetic standards whose origins and reasons we probably don’t know.

In commercial and public building the intangible is usually confined to adjectives like ‘iconic’, or ‘spectacular’, which parcel it with blandness and discourage further exploration. Such words also convert this troubling, unruly, hard-to-name aspect of buildings into something that aids marketing – since ‘icons’ can help sell a place or a business – into, that is, another form of use. Yet if emotion in building is intangible, it is also specific. Particular desires and feelings drive the making of architecture, and the experience of it, and are played out in particular ways. Hope, sex, the wish for power or money, the idea of home, the sense of mortality: these are definite, not vague, with distinct manifestations in architecture.

This book explores the ways in which these concerns of the living interact with the dead stuff of buildings. It will challenge easy assumptions about architecture: in particular that, once the builders move out, it is fixed and complete. It turns out that buildings are unstable: if their fabric is not being adjusted (and it usually is) they are prone to tricks of perception and inversions of value. This instability might feel disturbing, but it is also part of the fascination of architecture. If buildings were 1:1 translations of human urges, my study would be short and boring: if, for example, they were monosyllables made physical, where a pitched roof = home, something soaring = hope, big = power, or phallic = sex. Where things get interesting is when desire and built space change each other, when animate and inanimate interplay. Paradoxes arise, and things that seemed certain seem less so. Buildings are powerful but also awkward means of dealing with something as mobile as emotion, and usually they create an opposite or at least different effect to the one they set out to achieve.

To look at emotion and desire in architecture is not to discount the simple fact that most buildings have a practical purpose. But that practical purpose is rarely pursued with perfect detachment, or indifferent calculation. To build and to inhabit are not small actions, and it is hard to undertake them with coolness. Rather the play of function, of decisions on budget, durability, comfort, flexibility, and use, is one of the expressive properties of architecture.

Definitions are required. ‘Architecture’ is seen not just as the design of buildings, more as the making of spaces: it includes the design of landscape, interiors, and stage sets. A building is seen less as an end in itself, more as an instrument for making spaces, together with whatever else is around, both inside and outside. ‘Architecture’ can also include fictional and cinematic places, which sometimes reveal as much, and differently, as those you can touch.

‘To build’ is used in its usual way, as the action of contractors and workers, and of clients, architects, and other consultants, leading to the making of a physical construction. But the verb will also be used metaphorically, to describe the ways in which the people who use and experience buildings – that is, almost all of us – inhabit and shape, physically and in the imagination, the spaces we find.

This book is not a manual. It will not tell you how to decorate your home, or architecture students how to set about their work. Still less will it tell urban planners how to make wise decisions. Should it have an influence, I dread an outbreak of ‘emotional’ architecture, with sales guff from developers talking of ‘feelings’. Catastrophes will be described, and successes, and works somewhere between; also projects that started well and finished sadly, and vice versa. But the idea is not to make a score-sheet of good and bad, rather to see the many ways in which human impulses are played out in building. This book tries not to instruct, prescribe, or moralize. Its aim is to show, examine, and reveal.

I like to imagine, however, that this book could have some useful effect. Failures of architecture and development often occur because emotional choices come disguised as practical ones. If I can make it a little easier to discern what is going on in such situations, one or two disasters might, conceivably, be mitigated.

The post Competition: five copies of Why We Build
by Rowan Moore to give away
appeared first on Dezeen.

UK should “learn from the Netherlands” and build floating housing, says Alex de Rijke

The Dutch Way by dRMM

Dezeen Wire: “we’re advocating other UK architects to design on water,” architect Alex de Rijke told Dezeen at the Venice Architecture Biennale this week, where his firm dRMM are exhibiting proposals for floating housing at the British Pavilion.

Above: photograph is by Cristiano Corte

The Dutch Way by dRMM

“Our idea was to learn from the Netherlands and show how their ideas might be applicable to UK waterways,” he said. “There is no shortage of water in the UK and no shortage of rain, but there is a shortage of housing and a shortage of development sites.”

The Dutch Way by dRMM

Above: Water-houses in IJburg, Waterbuurt West, Amsterdam

The studio’s proposals are for an infrastructure of houseboats at London’s Royal Docks, and for the exhibition they present a floating terrace with an outboard engine and plastic floats.

dRMM

Above, left to right: Alex de Rijke, Merlin Eayrs and Isabel Pietri of dRMM, photographed by Valerie Bennett

Named The Dutch Way, the project is one of ten on show for the British Pavilion’s Venice Takeaway exhibition, which showcases ideas for British architecture brought back from other countries around the world by teams of ‘explorers’. Read the brief in our earlier story.

Alex de Rijke is also now dean of architecture at London’s Royal College of Art and gave us a tour of the end of year show plus outlined his new direction for the course earlier this summer.

See all our stories about the biennale here, including an interview with director David Chipperfield and our pick of the five best pavilions.

The post UK should “learn from the Netherlands” and build
floating housing, says Alex de Rijke
appeared first on Dezeen.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

Indian architect Anupama Kundoo brought a team of Indian craftsman to Italy to construct a replica of a house inside the Arsenale at the Venice Architecture Biennale.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

The building is a full-sized model of a house that Kundoo, who currently practices in Australia, completed in 2000 in Auroville, India.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

The craftsman, many of whom had never left India before, worked with students from the University of Queensland and the IUAV in Venice on the construction.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

The walls are built from hand-made Indian clay bricks, contrasting with the ancient Venetian brick columns of the Arsenale.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

The architect claims that terracotta pots are decreasingly used for cooking in the part of India mentioned, which is why they are used for the ceilings on both storeys of the structure.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

A dining table is positioned in the central space and is made from only a single log of wood, without any leftover material or any additional joinery.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

Photographs of the original house hang from the walls of some rooms, while a storeroom serves to display the different building materials.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

See more stories about architecture and design in India »

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

Watch our interview with biennale director David Chipperfield »

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

Read all our stories about the biennale »

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

Here’s a short description from the exhibition:


Feel the Ground. Wall House: One to One

Kundoo, an Indian architect now based in Australia, has built an ambitious 1:1 facsimile of the Wall House, a building she designed in Auroville, India in 2000.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

The common ground is in its making. A team of Indian craftsmen, some of whom had never before left their home country, were brought to Venice to construct the project in collaboration with staff and students from the University of Queensland and from IUAV in Venice, creating a skills exchange across three continents.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

The final piece embodies the dialogue between construct on cultures, and also is a showcase for Kundoo’s architecture, a lyrical modernism at ease with the demands of its climate.

Wall House by Anupama Kundoo at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

The post Wall House by Anupama Kundoo
at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012
appeared first on Dezeen.

Weathering Steel: What It is and Why They Use It

0weathste01.jpg

A few blocks down from Core77 HQ, a new building is going up on Broadway. As you can see in the photo above, the beams are already starting to rust.

A block over from the construction site is the recently-built Mondrian hotel, the facade of which is also starting to rust.

0weathste02.jpg

So what’s going on here? Substandard steel from overseas? Not quite. The material being used is called “weathering steel” and it’s been in architectural use, albeit sparingly, since the early 1960s.

Weathering steel is calibrated, on a chemical level, to begin rusting immediately on the outside. The rust actually serves as a protective layer, keeping the alloys on the inside safe from corrosion. And interestingly enough, the rust is sort of like human skin; according to Wikipedia, “The layer protecting the surface develops and regenerates continuously when subjected to the influence of the weather.”

The reason weathering steel is more of a specialty material and in sparing use is because 1) not everyone is into the aesthetic, and 2) it’s tricky to work with. The structure needs to be designed in such a way that water runs off of the steel and never puddles; standing water will stagnate the regeneration process and allow rust to spread unabated, eventually eating a hole clear through the material, like Alien blood on the floor of a spaceship.

Another problem with weathering steel is that during the initial rusting process, it drips yucky orange matter onto the sidewalks below, which will eventually have to be power-blasted off.

(more…)


Dutch Pavilion at Venice Architecture Biennale 2012

Curtains glide along tracks on the ceiling to constantly reconfigure the space inside the Dutch Pavilion at the Venice Architecture Biennale.

Dutch pavilion for Venice Architecture Bienalle 2012

Called Re-set: new wings for architecture, the installation is a sequel to the Vacant NL exhibition held on the same spot at the 2010 biennale: where the earlier show sought to highlight the quantity of empty buildings available for reuse, this new intervention hints at the possibilites for transforming existing, underused space.

Dutch pavilion for Venice Architecture Bienalle 2012

It was designed by Dutch designer Petra Blaisse of Inside Outside and curated by Ole Bouman, director of the Netherlands Architecture Institute.

Dutch pavilion for Venice Architecture Bienalle 2012

The curtains are made up of panels with varying levels of opacity, including fine gauze, heavy velvet and shiny metallics.

Dutch pavilion for Venice Architecture Bienalle 2012

The Venice Architecture Biennale opens to the public today and continues until 25 November.

Dutch pavilion for Venice Architecture Bienalle 2012

Check out our pick of the best five Giardini pavilions »
See photos of the preview on Facebook »

Dutch pavilion for Venice Architecture Bienalle 2012

Watch our interview with biennale director David Chipperfield »
Read all our stories about the biennale »

Dutch pavilion for Venice Architecture Bienalle 2012

Here’s some more information from the organisers:


During the upcoming edition of the International Architecture Exhibition in Venice, a single visit to the Dutch pavilion will not be enough. Anyone who wants to experience the full potential of an empty building will return. Perhaps more than once. Every five minutes the situation in the pavilion will be totally different, and anyone who stays for a while will witness a visually astounding transformation. With Re-set, new wings for architecture, Inside Outside / Petra Blaisse demonstrates that architecture possesses the power to start anew. The exhibition is being curated by Ole Bouman, Director of the Netherlands Architecture Institute (NAI). The 13th International Architecture Exhibition in Venice runs from 29 August to 25 November 2012.

An untouched tract of land and a substantial budget were for many years the chief preconditions for fine architecture, but the social issues of this day and age demand different points of departure. Taking advantage of existing potential and the creation of value in places where it seems to be vanishing – the ‘reanimation’ of desolate buildings – is increasingly becoming the architect’s core task.

With Re-set, Inside Outside / Petra Blaisse reveals a whole array of possibilities that an existing structure has to offer, taking the given situation as the starting point. With a mobile, tactile intervention, Petra Blaisse gives an impulse to a building that has stood vacant for 40 years – the Dutch Pavilion is in use for just three months of the year – an impulse that still awaits thousands of other Dutch buildings.

Petra Blaisse: ‘We are not going to hang Objets d’Art, exhibit works or stage events. We are responding to the vacant architecture itself. One single mobile object occupies the space for three months and emphasises the building’s unique qualities. This object will flow through the interior, re-configure its organisation and create new rooms along the way. Through relatively simple interventions the experience of light, sound and space will be manipulated so that new perspectives emerge.’

Re-set is the sequel to the Dutch submission to the International Architecture Exhibition in 2010, titled Vacant NL, a presentation by the Netherlands Architecture Institute (NAI) and Rietveld Landscape that shed light on the huge amount and enormous potential of disused buildings in the Netherlands. This presentation became a hot topic – in Venice, in the Netherlands, around the world – and one of the many things it spawned is the creation of an MA course on this very subject in the Netherlands.

The post Dutch Pavilion at Venice
Architecture Biennale 2012
appeared first on Dezeen.