The Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin by Daniel Libeskind

Daniel Libeskind has completed an education centre at the Jewish Museum Berlin, twelve years after the American architect completed his widely acclaimed extension (+ slideshow).

The Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin by Daniel Libeskind

Located across the street within the structure of Berlin’s old flower market, the Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin provides a new home to the museum’s library and archive, which has doubled in size over the last decade to accommodate both printed and digital records.

The Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin by Daniel Libeskind

At the entrance, Libeskind has designed a roughly-hewn timber box that bursts through the exterior wall, with angular skylights and a sliced opening to invite visitors inside. Two additional timber boxes are located within the building and house the library and auditorium.

The Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin by Daniel Libeskind

The 2300-square-metre centre will be used as a venue for educational workshops, lectures and conferences, and will also offer a meeting place for the 7000 guided tours run by the museum each year.

The Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin by Daniel Libeskind

The Jewish Museum Berlin is one of the largest museums of Jewish history in Europe and opened to the public in 2001, following the construction of Libeskind’s extension to the original 1930s building.

The Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin by Daniel Libeskind

“My ongoing collaboration with the Jewish Museum Berlin is a source of tremendous professional and personal pride,” said Daniel Libeskind. “Each project offers a fresh chance to illuminate Jewish history and culture, to understand the tragedies and the triumphs, and to celebrate the resilience, creativity and erudition that have been Jews’ enduring legacy.”

This year Libeskind was also selected to design a peace centre on the site of a former prison in Northern Ireland and completed a family of curved towers in Singapore.

See more stories about Daniel Libeskind »

Photography is by Bitter Bredt.

Here’s some more information from Studio Daniel Libeskind:


The Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin Will Be Forum for Research, Discussion and Education

Roughly a dozen years after Daniel Libeskind’s extension to the Jewish Museum Berlin opened to great acclaim in 2001, the museum has unveiled its latest collaboration with the architect, the Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin.

The 25,000-square-foot, one-storey Academy stands on the site of Berlin’s one-time flower market, whose shell undergirds the new structure. Located across from the museum proper, the Academy brings together its library, archives and education center and offers additional office, storage and support space for the museum.

Since the museum’s reopening in 2001, its public and educational programs have more than doubled. In addition to 7,000 guided tours each year, the museum offers more than 400 educational programs ranging from workshops for children to training courses for museum professionals. The new facility will house these programs as well as symposia, conferences, lectures and seminars.

The museum’s library and archives have also moved to the Academy. The archives, which contain both printed and audio-visual materials, have also doubled in size over the last decade while the library’s holdings have tripled.

In-Between Spaces

Daniel Libeskind’s design for the Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin links the building to the museum’s other structures and open spaces, both thematically and structurally.

One of the first things visitors see upon entering the piazza leading to the building are the words of the great medieval Jewish scholar and philosopher Moses Maimonides. His famous adjuration, “Hear the truth, whoever speaks it,” is splashed across the left side of the façade, a reminder that those who delve into history must be prepared to accept what they find regardless of the source. The five languages in which the charge is given – English, German, Hebrew, Arabic and the original Judeo-Arabic of medieval Spain – reinforce that message while also suggesting the universal nature of truth.

On the right, a large downward-sloping cube bursts through the façade. Its unusual contours echo the jagged shape of the museum’s 2001 extension, designed by Mr. Libeskind and visible across the street. That shape is also a variation on a theme found in the museum’s Garden of Exileand Glass Courtyard, also designed by Mr. Libeskind and opened 2007 and 2005, respectively.

Two large skylights, visible from the piazza, rest atop the cube. Shaped like the Hebrew letters Alef and Bet (A and B), they are another reminder of the importance of learning and knowledge to the human experience and of their centrality to Jewish life.

After passing through a large gash in the cube that serves as the Academy’s entryway, visitors are decanted into transitional space comprising two more huge cubes. Thrust forward at odd angles, the cubes, which house the library and the auditorium, form a jagged triumvirate with the rear end of entrance cube.

The movement and interaction suggested by the cubes’ shape and placement and by the seemingly rough-hewn timber (actually radiate pine timber) used to fabricate them suggests the sort of crates used to transport precious objects, including books. They also suggest Noah’s Ark, which preserved the most precious thing of all – living beings, in all their splendid variety – during the most important voyage in biblical history.

“In-Between Spaces,” Mr. Libeskind’s name for his design, describes the transitional area among the three cubes. It also alludes to the different perspectives offered by that unique vantage point. Standing on that spot, looking into the hall and out on to museum’s other structures and spaces, visitors are ideally placed to reflect on the museum’s larger purpose and their own experience of it.

The post The Academy of the Jewish Museum Berlin
by Daniel Libeskind
appeared first on Dezeen.

Watchdog apologises for saying Renzo Piano “not entitled” to be called an architect

Renzo Piano

News: the UK’s government-appointed architecture watchdog has apologised for saying that Renzo Piano (above) and Daniel Libeskind are “not entitled to be described” as architects.

Last week the Architects Registration Board, which polices use of the protected title of “architect” in the UK, told Building Design magazine not to describe Piano and Libeskind as architects, as they are not registered as such in the UK.

Following a complaint from a UK architect, the board sent the publication an email stating: “In the light of BD’s readership I would ask that you avoid referring to Mr Piano and Mr Libskind [sic] as ‘architect’s [sic] in any future publications.”

In a clarification published on the ARB website, the body’s registrar Alison Carr said that “a significant number of concerns” had subsequently been raised about the matter, adding: “We should have been more cautious so that we get the right message across at the right time, and for that I apologise.”

ARB was established in 1997 to police a new law – the 1997 Architects Act – introduced to protect consumers, maintain professional standards and keep a register of practicing architects. Only fully qualified architects registered with ARB are allowed to use the title.

“The whole thing is ludicrous,” BD editor Amanda Baillieu told Dezeen. “Renzo Piano is an architect. He trained in Milan. You can read it on Wikipedia.”

Baillieu added: “You have to protect consumers from people who pass themselves off as architects – but anyone can put in a planning application. They should protect the function [of an architect] not the title.”

The letter from ARB to BD referred to three articles, including “one referring to Piano as architect of the Shard and another about a new project by Libeskind in Hong Kong” and states that: ”All three articles make reference to either Mr Renzo Piano or Mr Daniel Libskind [sic] as ‘architects’, however, as they are not registered with the ARB they are not entitled to be described as such.”

BD reported reported on Friday that the letter, from ARB professional standards manager Simon Howard, says that it is “OK to call Piano an Italian architect”.

The post Watchdog apologises for saying Renzo Piano “not entitled” to be called an architect appeared first on Dezeen.

Asia’s Tallest Mural by Hendrik Beikirch

German artist Hendrik Beikirch has painted a 70-metre-high mural of a fisherman a few blocks away from Daniel Libeskind’s Haeundae I’Park skyscrapers in Busan, South Korea (+ slideshow).

Asia's Tallest Mural by Hendrik Beikirch

Beikirch’s elderly fisherman represents the large number of South Koreans still working in traditional industries who have not felt the benefits of the country’s rapid economic development, signified by the glass and steel skyscrapers in the background.

Asia's Tallest Mural by Hendrik Beikirch

Beikirch painted the mural on the side of Busan’s fishing union building located between Haeundae and Gwangalli beaches. Underneath is a statement in Korean which translates as: “Where there is no struggle, there is no strength.”

Asia's Tallest Mural by Hendrik Beikirch

The project was led by Public Delivery, a Seoul-based organisation that promotes contemporary art across Asia and Europe, who explain that Beikirch ”deliberately distances himself from the polished and artificial aesthetic of advertising” usually found in public spaces.

Asia's Tallest Mural by Hendrik Beikirch

For more outdoor art, have a look at Dezeen’s map of Hackney locating stencil work by street artist Banksy.

Asia's Tallest Mural by Hendrik Beikirch

See all our stories about art »
See all our stories about Daniel Libeskind »

Here’s some more information from Public Delivery:


During the last week of August 2012, German painter Hendrik Beikirch created not only a stunning work but an iconic piece that stretches over 70 metres (230 ft.) high and is yet to be considered as Asia’s tallest mural. Located in South Korea‘s second largest city, Busan, this piece showcases a monochromatic mural of a fisherman, set in contrast with the Haeundae I’Park building at the background, constructed by renowned architect Daniel Libeskind.

The Haeundae I’Park is a residential building and is also a symbol for the rapid development and accumulated wealth in Korea, a poor country not too long ago. The mural that depicts an image of a fisherman represents a significant portion of Korea‘s population that has not been affected by the economic growth and until now, lives under very different circumstances compared to their affluent neighbors.

Responsible for this project is Public Delivery, a organisation who has made waves across Asia and Europe through the promotion of contemporary art. The artwork will be on display for an indefinite period of time.

The painting

The mural presents a local fisherman in his 60s, staring into an intangible space with his face marked with wrinkles, still wearing long plastic gloves – a sign that there are still men and women like him at this age working for a living. This dying profession entails six to seven days of work in a week, under difficult circumstances, while just receiving a minimum amount of financial support, just enough to buy certain needs.

However, despite the story behind the portrait, the painting conveys a positive message seen in the emotion shown by the fisherman. In addition, underneath it, Beikirch added a statement in Korean letters which roughly translate to “Where there is no struggle, there is no strength.”

Beikirch is known for his artworks set in monochromatic and detailed painting and this is no difference. Unlike other artists, he painted this mural without using a projector or a sketch on the wall. This, in its true form, is a masterful performance and a task that requires enormous routine and outstanding precision.

The location

The painting is applied on the building of Busan‘s fishing union. It is located between Korea’s two most famous beaches, Haeundae (해운대해수욕장) and Gwangalli (광안리해수욕장), clearly visible from the latter. Over the past years, both beaches turned into excessive commercial areas and became heavy motors for the city‘s tourism, attracting mostly Korean, Japanese, Chinese and Russian travelers.

The building is also home to a fish market that provides the prosperous inhabitants of Busan, like those living in the Hyundai I’Park building, with Korean style raw fish (hoe, 회), a pricey delicacy that is similar to Japanese sashimi.

The artist

Hendrik Beikirch (b. 1974) is a German painter well known for his series of large monochromatic wall paintings that often show portraits of older people, visibly marked by life. In order to create these works, Beikirch secretly takes sketches of strangers whom he encounters on his travels, noticing them for their aura and expression between hope and struggle. This inspired the title of his on-going series “Faces of Hope and Struggle” and runs seamlessly on the canvases of Beikirch, which mostly displays the same frontal view of unfamiliar people. He deliberately distances himself from the polished and artificial aesthetic of advertising, which has now occupied major parts in public space.

Beikirch always works with a reduced color palette, and therefore the high recognition factor ensures that viewers now can easily find walls by him all over Europe, Canada, the USA, Mexico, Chile, Australia, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Thailand, Russia and other countries, all painted in the last 15 years.

Partners

This project would not have been possible without the support of The Busan Cultural Foundation, The Arts Council Korea, Busan Metropolitan City, Indie Culture Network AGIT and Suyeong Local Government. MBC, the oldest and one of the major commercial Korean broadcasting companies, is the main media partner.

The post Asia’s Tallest Mural
by Hendrik Beikirch
appeared first on Dezeen.

“Daniel Libeskind selected for Maze prison site” – BBC

Daniel Libeskind

Architect Daniel Libeskind has been selected to design a peace centre on the site of the notorious former Maze prison in Northern Ireland, according to the BBC.

The prison near Belfast was used to house paramilitary prisoners during the Troubles in the region from 1971. It was the scene of acts of defiance by prisoners against the British, including the hunger strikes of 1981, in which ten prisoners died. The prison closed in 2000.

The BBC reports that Libeskind has been chosen for the £18 million “conflict transformation centre” following an international tendering process.

Libeskind made his name designing the Jewish Museum in Berlin, which opened in 2001, and has since become associated with monuments to conflict including the Imperial War Museum North in Salford, England and the Institute for Democracy and Conflict Resolution, due to be built at the University of Essex in England.

See all our stories about Daniel Libeskind.

The post “Daniel Libeskind selected for Maze prison site” – BBC appeared first on Dezeen.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Skyscrapers in Seoul: this skyscraper with a pointy midriff is the second of two stories about buildings designed for the Yongsan International Business District in Seoul, South Korea, by architect Daniel Libeskind.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Harmony Tower will be located in the north-eastern corner of the new commercial district next to another skyscraper designed by architect Dominique Perrault and will contain offices on 38 of its 46 floors.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Sheltered gardens will line the southern and eastern facades, offering views out towards the nearby Han river.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

The base of the building will also taper inwards to create a larger area of landscaping around the entrance.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

See more stories about the Yongsan International Business District, including a slideshow of all the projects commissioned by developer DreamHub.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Here’s some more information from Studio Daniel Libeskind:


Harmony Tower

Harmony Tower, a project that is part of the new Yongsan International Business district (YIBD)development in Seoul, is an iconic, 21st century sustainable office tower that is 46 floors.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

The design for the tower is inspired by YunDeung, traditional Korean paper lanterns. The concept is to create a tower as a faceted lantern, whose multiple planes reflect the sky and the earth and capture the light on its differing angles, creating a glowing gateway and beacon in the YIBD site.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

The sculpted tower is subtly shaped by the urban context. The tower tapers at its base to create a feeling of space and openness for the pedestrian plaza. The form then reaches out in the middle of the tower to maximize the floor plates and Han River views and to create a sense of scale marking the gateway from the western entrance to the site. The tower then tapers back and up to its top to allow the most light and air onto the other towers around, creating a strong ascending peak to the tower. The tower form creates multiple perspectives, like a sculpture in the round, with an ever changing public profile responding specifically to the site.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

The tower contains unique vertical winter gardens on the south and west facades, providing users access to natural ventilation and planted park settings at each of the 38 office floors. The gardens not only act as a special amenity to all the tenants, but also a buffer to the direct sunlight hitting the glass building. The gardens function as open, park space within the building, but also help to reduce the heat gain and allow the building to function more sustainably. Harmony Tower is a state of the art workplace, interweaving themes of nature, sustainability, and efficiency in a faceted, sculptural form.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Location: Seoul, South Korea
Building size: 100,000 sq.m
Structure: Concrete central core and floor slabs with steel columns and mega bracing
Client: Dream Hub, AMC – Yongsan Development Co., Ltd.

Harmony Tower by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Structural engineer: ARUP
Mechanical / Electrical / Plumbing engineer: ARUP
Landscape architect: Martha Schwartz Partners
Lighting designer: Focus Lighting
Status: In design

Dancing Towers by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Dancing Towers by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Skyscrapers in Seoul: the first of two stories about buildings that architect Daniel Libeskind has designed for the Yongsan International Business District that he masterplanned for Seoul, South Korea, features three towers inspired by the movements of a Korean Buddhist dance.

Dancing Towers by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Named Dancing Towers, the 41-storey skyscrapers will each have a curved body that the architect likens to the twisted sleeves of traditional Seung-Moo dancers’ costumes.

Dancing Towers by Studio Daniel Libeskind

All three towers will be positioned on a single podium, which will house the shared foyer for 834 apartments on the upper storeys.

Dancing Towers by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Just like SOM’s proposals nearby, the towers will contain structural columns within their curtain wall facades, so as not to interrupt the spaces within.

Dancing Towers by Studio Daniel Libeskind

See more stories about the Yongsan International Business District, including a slideshow of all the projects commissioned by developer DreamHub.

Dancing Towers by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Here’s a project description from Studio Daniel Libeskind:


Dancing Towers

Dancing Towers, a project that is part of the new Yongsan International Business District YIBD development in Seoul, is a mixed used development that consists of three 41 story residential towers,( a total of 834 total residential units) with amenities, retail, parking and a connecting commercial podium base.

Dancing Towers by Studio Daniel Libeskind

The design for the Dancing Towers is inspired by the traditional Korean Buddhist Dance known as Seung-Moo. The subtle rotation of the towers creates the illusion they are dancing, as inspired by the long sleeves of the Seung-Moo dancer’s traditional costumes, gracefully propelled by the dancer’s movements. The towers are engineered with a unique structure of a central concrete core and alternating cantilevered fin walls to support the floors that create column free buildings that allow the forms to ‘dance’ and twist while opening up panoramic views from the apartment interiors.

Dancing Towers by Studio Daniel Libeskind

While creating an interrelated composition, the location of the three towers in the site and each tower’s rotations are oriented to create maximum light and views toward the water, the YIBD project, the city of Seoul and the mountains beyond for the residents.

Dancing Towers by Studio Daniel Libeskind

Location: Seoul, South Korea
Building size: 265,000 sq.m
Structure: Concrete central core with cantilevered concrete fin walls and floor slabs
Client: Dream Hub, AMC – Yongsan Development Co., Ltd.
Structural engineer: ARUP
Mechanical / Electrical / Plumbing engineer: ARUP
Landscape architect: Martha Schwartz Partners
Lighting designers: Focus Lighting
Status: In design

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

Architect Daniel Libeskind has completed a family of curved towers beside a bay in Singapore.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

Alternating between 24 and 41 storeys-high, the six glazed residential towers feature rooftop gardens and are connected to one another by elevated bridges.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

The Reflections at Keppel Bay development also includes a series of aluminium-clad apartment blocks that accompany the high-rise buildings to create over a thousand new residences in total.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

You can see more projects by Daniel Libeskind here, including a war museum that sparked a fiery debate amongst our readers.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

Photography is © Courtesy of Keppel Bay Pte Ltd – a Keppel Land Company.

Here’s a longer description from Studio Daniel Libeskind:


Keppel Harbor, Reflections at Keppel Bay

Prominently situated at the entrance to Sin­gapore’s historic Keppel Harbor, Reflections at Keppel Bay is a two-million-square-foot residential development comprised of 6 high-rise towers ranging from 24 and 41 stories and 11 low-rise villa apart­ment blocks of 6–8 floors– a total of 1,129 units.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

The series of high-rise undulating towers is the focal point of this project. These sleek curving forms of alternating heights create graceful openings and gaps between the structures allowing all to have commanding views of the waterfront, Sentosa, the golf course and Mount Faber.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

The Libeskind design for Reflections at Keppel Bay skillfully tackles the challenge faced by architects working in contexts such as Singapore: the high-density construction needed to recoup the exorbitant cost of real estate. To address this issue, rather than equally distributing the density across the site with similar building types, the design is composed of two distinct typologies of housing; the lower Villa blocks along the water front and the high-rise towers which over look them set just behind.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

The artful composition of ever shifting building orientations, along with the differing building typologies, creates an airy, light-filled grouping of short and tall structures. These ever shifting forms create an experience where each level feels unique as it is not in alignment with either the floor above or below.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

No two alike residences are experienced next to one another or seen from the same perspective; the result of this design is a fundamental shift in living in a high-rise where individuality and difference is not sacrificed.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

A recipient of the BCA Green Mark Gold Award  from Singapore’s building and construction authority, the form, construction and materials of the buildings are unprecedented for Singapore and particularly for a residential development.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

The double curvatures of the high-rise towers are unique in the world for structure and construction; they are clad with a fully unitized and insulated curtain wall which is among the first for residential developments in the region.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

The low-rise villas along the water front are clad in anodized aluminum that creates a luminous surface and provides additional insulation. The six towers are crowned with lush sky gardens on sloping rooflines and linked by sky bridges, providing pockets of open spaces and platforms and unobstructed 360-degree views, the kind of green, open space, rarely found in high-rise buildings.

Reflections at Keppel Bay by Daniel Libeskind

Daniel Libeskind’s first residential project in Asia, and his largest completed residential project to date, Reflections is a creative in­terplay of changing planes and reflections.  It defies the inherent nature of high-density residential developments with its innovative approach to design– creating a new land mark for the greater Singapore.

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind – more images

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

British photographers Hufton + Crow have sent us new images of the Dresden Museum of Military History, which reopened last month following an extension by New York architect Daniel Libeskind.

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Libeskind drove a pointed steel and glass shard through the skin of the historic museum to create new galleries on five floors and a 30 metre-high rooftop viewing platform.

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

When we originally published the story, many readers were outraged with the design, with one commentor suggesting it to be like a giant axe cutting through the building.

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Critics also had a lot to say. Architecture journalist Rowan Moore described the building as both “breathtaking” and “breathtakingly dumb”, while critic Mary Lane compared it to “a piece of shrapnel freshly fallen from the sky” – read more about the critics opinions here.

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Daniel Libeskind also recently completed a media centre for the University of Hong Kong – see our earlier story here and see all our stories about Libeskind here.

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Another controversial museum we’ve published recently is the heavily criticised Museum of Liverpool – read more about that project here.

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

See also: more stories about museums.

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Photographers Hufton + Crow have shot a number of high-profile projects this year – see their photographs of the Serpentine Pavilion by Peter Zumthor and the Olympic Aquatics Centre by Zaha Hadid.

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Dresden Museum of Military History by Daniel Libeskind

Critics’ reactions to Libeskind’s Military History Museum


Dezeen Wire:
 architecture critics have been offering their thoughts on Daniel Libeskind’s divisive Military History Museum in Dresden, which opened earlier this month.

The Observer‘s architecture critic Rowan Moore praised the spaces where the old museum meets the new addition but admonished the shard-like extension for its lack of functional space, stating: “The design’s weakness is its belief that sheer shape can speak on its own.”

In a review for The Wall Street Journal, Mary M. Lane described Libeskind’s intervention as “a piece of shrapnel freshly fallen from the sky” and outlines the architect’s motivations for working on the project, as a child of Holocaust survivors.

Writing in German publication Deutsche Welle, Ronny Arnold said that Libeskind’s renovation marks a new beginning and claims that “the museum is moving away from the mere presentation of war equipment and toward multidimensionality,” while Erin Huggins of The Local obtained a positive response to the building from museum spokesman Major Lars Berg, who said: “It’s an interesting combination of conventional components and something very progressive that one wouldn’t expect from the military.”

Libeskind’s design has had our readers up in arms – see the article and comments here and see all of our previous stories on Daniel Libeskind here.

Dezeenwire

Back to Dezeenwire »
Back to Dezeen »

Libeskind’s Military History Museum should be “more than a gesture”- The Observer


Dezeen Wire:
 in his latest review for The Observer architecture critic Rowan Moore criticises Daniel Libeskind‘s angular five-storey extension to the Military History Museum in Dresden, stating that ”something so large and conspicuous should surely be more than a gesture.”

Moore claims that the new intervention interacts successfully with the existing 1870s building but adds that some of the spaces are not as interesting as they should be and describes the projecting shard as “at once breathtaking, verging on the wonderful, and breathtakingly dumb.”

We had an amazing response when we published our story on the museum a few weeks ago. One reader described the design as “insensitive and inconsiderate,” while there was some praise including this comment: “Brave and bonkers. Excellent!” – see the story and comments here and all of our previous stories on Daniel Libeskind here

Dezeenwire

Back to Dezeenwire »
Back to Dezeen »