The Design Response to a Wash of Green: Whole Systems and Life Cycle Thinking, by Simon Lockrey

pimg alt=”keepcup-top.jpg” src=”http://s3files.core77.com/blog/images/keepcup-top.jpg” width=”468″ height=”468″ class=”mt-image-none” style=”” //p

pemThe Keep Cup, a reusable cup for the takeaway espresso market./em /p

pWhat a great idea: a ‘green’ product to make a difference, make one happy, and assist in performing the menial tasks that litter an otherwise hectic day. Or is it? Consumer decision-making is beginning to follow a distinctly ‘green’ trend, which is fantastic in principle but often contrived in reality. What does this mean for the designer who imagines, designs and creates these goods that cater for growing consumer demand in ‘sustainability?’ There lies the contradiction between designing for the consumption obsessed market and designing to the core principles of sustainability, where environmental, economic and social aspects are somewhat detached from a consumer driven market./p

div class=”article_quote”A designer in an appliance company designs a product for disassembly although there is no effective product stewardship scheme to collect the parts from reclaimed models./div

pAccording to Ezio Manzini, design theorist from the famed Politecnico di Milano, we have a crisis of the commons (common areas, goods, etc), a lack of contemplative time (a time poor existence, longer hours at work, etc), and most relevant to designers, a proliferation of remedial goods (a href=”http://www.changedesign.org/Resources/Manzini/Manuscripts/ManziniScenarios.pdf”Manzini 2003/a). The latter sees products solving every perceived problem imaginable. Whether it is a toothbrush that oscillates the plaque off in half the time, or a breakfast bar filling the five-minute bus ride, we have become increasingly, unconsciously used to products feeding our increasing wants, without a thought as to how that consumption impacts the environment. Last century, the raw materials consumed by one person in the US increased five fold (a href=”http://www.pubs.usgs.gov/annrev/ar-23-107/aerdocnew.pdf”Matos and Wagner 1998/a). This looks more ominous when combined with the fact that only around 15-20 % of the world is highly developed to a US or western style of consumption (a href=”www.hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2009_EN_Complete.pdf”UN, 2009/a). One approach is for design to lower the user’s consumption, without degrading the consumer’s experience. The question is whether the new breed of ‘eco’ products adds to the crisis, or makes a real difference./pa href=”http://www.core77.com/blog/featured_items/the_design_response_to_a_wash_of_green_whole_systems_and_life_cycle_thinking_by_simon_lockrey__17272.asp”(more…)/a
pa href=”http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/e8aiOFqBuuHoZkAIlIX1VTzWy8M/0/da”img src=”http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/e8aiOFqBuuHoZkAIlIX1VTzWy8M/0/di” border=”0″ ismap=”true”/img/abr/
a href=”http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/e8aiOFqBuuHoZkAIlIX1VTzWy8M/1/da”img src=”http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/e8aiOFqBuuHoZkAIlIX1VTzWy8M/1/di” border=”0″ ismap=”true”/img/a/p

No Responses to “The Design Response to a Wash of Green: Whole Systems and Life Cycle Thinking, by Simon Lockrey”

Post a Comment