12 Inspirational and Exclusive Interviews on Yanko Design – Dr. Prof. Peter Zec (Part II)

As we close into Christmas and get ready for the holidays, it seems the perfect time to take a step back and reflect on how the year has passed by. Did we learn any lessons; could we have done anything differently and more importantly, how do we utilize the knowledge that we have gained through the year. While you ponder these thoughts, let’s add the Panama Story to our list. As promised, here is the second installment to Dr. Prof. Peter Zec’s interview conducted in Essen earlier this year.

The wealth of knowledge that has been amassed by Dr. Zec is easily translated and understood by listening to this simple children’s story. No wonder he always narrates it to his students. This special podcast allows you to hear the story in totality and Dr. Zec’s narrative is very easy to understand and follow.

Moving on, I have broken down the interview into two sections and this one addresses issues like Innovation vs Being Different and how important it is for a designer to understand that design is a service for a client. Only when we understand the difference between art and design, can we apply the business angle to this industry.

As we know Dr. Zec is associated with red dot and is the main driving force behind the awards. I have seen him do his bit for the industry up close and one of the initiatives that he co-created is the red dot young professional’s entry slot. Basically 50 designers who have obtained their academic qualifications within the past five years, have the chance to apply for one out of 50 free registrations to the “red dot award: product design 2013”. Any designer worth his profession knows how coveted the red dot product design award is, and this platform encourages young talent to get the edge just as they embark upon their designing career. Good thing is that the application for this freebie is tomorrow 18th December 2012. Details for the same can be found here. Good Luck!

Previous interviews in this series:

Hideshi Hamaguchi, Yves Béhar, Karim Rashid, Scott Wilson, Robert Brunner


Yanko Design
Timeless Designs – Explore wonderful concepts from around the world!
Yanko Design Store – We are about more than just concepts. See what’s hot at the YD Store!
(12 Inspirational and Exclusive Interviews on Yanko Design – Dr. Prof. Peter Zec (Part II) was originally posted on Yanko Design)

Related posts:

  1. 12 Inspirational and Exclusive Interviews on Yanko Design – Dr. Prof. Peter Zec (Part I)
  2. 12 Inspirational and Exclusive Interviews on Yanko Design – Yves Béhar
  3. 12 Inspirational and Exclusive Interviews on Yanko Design – Robert Brunner

Interview: Matt Vasquez : We team up with Braun to talk to Delta Spirit’s Lead Singer Matt Vasquez about his favorite Built to Perform possession

Interview: Matt Vasquez

Sponsored content: In a high performance world, Braun creates innovative designs built to last seven years. For the Built to Perform series Braun profiles 15 guys in an intimate look at their life passions and the unique objects of design and durability that power their life. Seven years ago, Delta…

Continue Reading…

Interview: Thomas Girst: BMW continues to encourage the arts with a guide book to private collections and new installations in Mumbai and Miami

Interview: Thomas Girst

BMW asked us to join them for part of Miami’s Art and Design week, and between the fairs and the tours of private collections we had the chance to sit down with Thomas Girst, BMW Group’s Head of Cultural Engagement, to hear what they’ve been up to lately. Long…

Continue Reading…

“I was horrified at the thought of a soulless chain” – Aesop founder

Interview: recently Dezeen met up with Dennis Paphitis, founder of skincare brand Aesop. In this exclusive interview he explains why no two stores are of the same design, why he enjoys working with different architects around the world and how he believes “there’s a direct correlation between interesting, captivating store spaces and customer traffic within a store” (+ slideshow).

Aesop founder Dennis Paphitis

In the interview, conducted by Dezeen editor-in-chief Marcus Fairs, Paphitis (above) explains how the brand has worked with different design teams to avoid “the kind of assault on the streetscape that retailers inflict through the ordinary course of mindless business.”

“I was horrified at the thought of Aesop evolving into a soulless chain,” he says. “I’ve always imagined what we do as the equivalent of a weighty, gold charm bracelet on the tanned wrist of a glamorous, well-read European woman who has travelled and collected interesting experiences. I felt and still do that it should be possible to grow in a lateral way without prostituting the essence of what the company is about.”

Aesop at Merci, Melbourne, by March Studio

Above: Aesop at Merci, Melbourne, by March Studio

The slideshow [top of page] features several new and previously unpublished Aesop stores. See all our stories about Aesop stores.


Marcus Fairs: Tell me the story of Aesop.

Dennis Paphitis: I’m an ex-hairdresser. I guess the qualities that remain important in Aesop stores today were also important in the salon back in the days when I was cutting hair. In busy, high traffic environments a sense of calm and composure can quickly recalibrate how people feel. I attracted complicated and difficult clients, so keeping the space visually ordered and contained made it easier for me to think and work in.

Product-wise I started by adding essential oils to the commercial hair colour we were using at the time, because the smell of ammonia is quite overwhelming. Clients responded well to these less aggressive aromas. I then looked further into other ingredients and started work with a chemist on a small range of hair care products. Eventually the hair product extended to a hand and body product category and finally skin care. I started to think this could be developed into a more substantial offer if I gave myself fully to it.

So in 1996 I stepped out of the salon altogether, and spent the next few years with our first chemist setting up the foundation for a fuller product line and more serious development. All this was done without a great deal of commercial aspiration. I was simply interested in what was happening with the product and learning more about the science of manufacturing and ingredient sourcing, product shelf life: all the necessary components of developing product and trying to do something well. The idea was to use fewer, better ingredients in a smarter way.

Aesop Shin-Marunouchi, Tokyo

Above: Aesop Shin-Marunouchi, Tokyo, by Torafu Architects

Marcus Fairs: Why did you decide to open your own stores?

Dennis Paphitis: We would try and explain to retailers that were retailing our product how we would like to be represented and communicated, but we didn’t have a tangible example to demonstrate this to them. It was all in our heads yet there wasn’t a physical reference. So the moment you do that and you control the smallest, most innocuous details such as temperature, lighting, music, smells, tactility, and the materiality of a space this has a very profound impact. Of course there must be a solid and serious product offer to have legitimacy, but these peripheral factors actually compliment the product line up. It was liberating and we were able to express ourselves as who we are.

Aesop Saint-Honoré, Paris by March Studio

Above: Aesop Saint-Honoré by March Studio

Marcus Fairs: Where was the first store?

Dennis Paphitis: The company is 25 years old however the first Aesop store proper is only 10 years old this month and we’re happy it’s still there. It’s in Melbourne, in an area called St Kilda, which I guess is a little bit like the Shoreditch or the Hackney in these parts. It felt like the appropriate area to begin in. We couldn’t find a location however there was an iconic hotel called The Prince that had a car parking ramp that was 3m wide and 25m long. They gave us this space to work with and we redirected the car park users to enter an exit from around the corner. So that was the bones of our first store.

Marcus Fairs: How many do you have now?

Dennis Paphitis: At this moment I think we have 61 stores and there are nine stores in progress; four of those are in the US, which is a huge step for us in that part of the world.

Aesop Grand Central Kiosk, New York by Tacklebox

Above: Aesop Grand Central Kiosk, New York, by Tacklebox

Marcus Fairs: The design of each of your stores is different, and you’ve worked with several different architects around the world. What’s the thinking behind that?

Dennis Paphitis: After St Kilda we opened a second store in the central part of Melbourne and opened our first store in Taipei within a few months of both. So through necessity we began to work with different architects, because of the overlapping timing. For example we needed to work with a local Taiwanese architect on the first store there. And that just got me thinking about the kind of assault on the streetscape that retailers inflict through the ordinary course of mindless business, the idea that one size would so often be forced to fit all. It wasn’t so hard to respectfully consider each space individually, consider the customer, the context and to bring a little joy into the conversation.

I was horrified at the thought of Aesop evolving into a soulless chain. I’ve always imagined what we do as the equivalent of a weighty, gold charm bracelet on the tanned wrist of a glamorous, well-read European woman who has travelled and collected interesting experiences. I felt and still do that it should be possible to grow in a lateral way without prostituting the essence of what the company is about, to have the confidence to evolve yet the retain the core of what distinguishes us. It’s become politically incorrect to discuss good taste but actually this what Aesop does best. We aspire toward a certain quality, discretion and restraint in our work. These are qualities that are almost counter intuitive in a retail market desperate to cater to short attention spans and infinite choice.

Architecturally our criteria is always to try and work with what is already there and to weave ourselves into the core and fabric of the street, rather than to impose what we were doing. We didn’t ever want a standard Aesop shade of orange or green that was plastered onto stores with a nasty logo over it, but instead to look at the streetscape and try to retain and redeem existing facades that are there, and work with a local and relevant vocabulary to contextualise what we do.

There remains a core palette of ideas that we work with: we know that every store has to have sufficient display space, by product category. For example you need to be able to walk in and say to the customer, “This is where the skincare is, this is where the hair is, the body care,” etcetera. We need a counter for transactions to occur, we need water, we need back-of-house storage, some space to sit and contemplate and think about the day. So there are all these factors that don’t vary by region but the possibility of expressing them fully will vary according to space, light and budget. It’s the same product that we’re selling worldwide but it needs to fit and connect locally.

Aesop Newbury Street, Boston, by William O'Brien Jr

Above: Aesop Newbury Street, Boston, by William O’Brien Jr

Marcus Fairs: When did you start expanding internationally?

Dennis Paphitis: Five or six years ago we looked at where we would open the first offshore company-controlled store, because Taiwan was an arrangement with an external party there. Four of us took a trip to LA, San Francisco, London and Paris and we knew that it would be one of those four cites. We opted to set up the first stall in Paris, which was really quite absurd because none of us at that time spoke French and we were aware of the commercial bureaucracy and so forth that one deals with in France.

But actually it was quite a straightforward and invigorating process once we found a store that appealed to us in the sixth. We looked at some spaces and found a bookstore that we liked and tracked down the architect. He spoke little English but there was an immediate human connection between all of us. We worked well together, and more or less from that moment on we then started to explore the possibility of working with local architects project managing development from Melbourne.

Aesop Bleecker Street, New York

We’ve continued on this path since with some architects that we’ve worked with many times over such as Rodney Eggleston, who is the founder of March Studio in Melbourne; we’ve just completed our twelfth project with him at Bleecker Street in New York [above]. Similarly Kerstin Thompson from KTA who we’re working on our sixth project with a new Adelaide store. We’ve completed five projects with Ciguë who are a fantastic young Paris based firm and are also beginning two London projects with them in the New Year.

My personal criteria in selecting architects for long term unions is not singularly the excellence of their work but more so their psycho-emotional state and capacity to communicate, function under pressure and ultimately deliver the goods with minimal trauma. There are some very impressive characters out there, this year we’ve begun three projects with NADAAA in Boston who are perhaps the most professional and sophisticated firm we’ve worked with.

Marcus Fairs: You tend to have clusters of stories in cities like London and Paris, rather than one store in every city. Why is that?

Dennis Paphitis: The thing with us is we like to go deep rather than wide, so we can’t set up a store in London then just open another one in Barcelona and in Glasgow because it seems like a good idea. We need to do a series of interconnected stores in London or whichever the chosen city is because we need the back office support structure to make it all work and hang together well. Less spread, more depth of presence with a strong and switched on infrastructure to support this.

Marcus Fairs: What influence does interior design have on sales and the performance of the shop?

Dennis Paphitis: There’s a direct correlation between interesting, captivating store spaces and customer traffic and interest within a store. I’m personally more comfortable with under-designed looking design, if that makes sense, or design that dissolves and recedes rather than screams ‘look how clever I am’. It’s not singularly the design but also a whole series of seemingly miniscule decisions and very fine calibrations that converge together to make space captivating and comfortable to be in.

Aesop at I.T Hysan One, Hong Kong by Cheungvogl

Above: Aesop at I.T Hysan One, Hong Kong by Cheungvogl

Marcus Fairs: How do you choose your architects?

Dennis Paphitis: We like to take them green but not too green; they need to have a little bit of blood on their hands. The minimum criterion is five years post-graduate working experience unless they’re extraordinarily talented and there’s some compelling reason to consider them. But if they’re 15 years into their professional journey we need to check that they’re not having a mid-life crisis or whatever it is that might implode or distract them during the process. It’s a fine line.

We sit down and share coffee and meals and try and understand their motivations. Often we are the ones seeking them out, we will see something they’ve done, hear about a talent graduate, discover some long ago project that captivates us. And then we present what we need to achieve with them and give the scope to interpret this whilst at the same time ensuring that there are sufficient shelves to store our product and a space for our staff in the back room to have lunch, a point of sale, and basins because we need water in every store, and a provision to have music, and all of the practical details that make a retail space functional and successful.

Aesop Ginza, Tokyo, by Schemata Architecture Office

Above: Aesop Ginza, Tokyo, by Schemata Architecture Office

Marcus Fairs: How involved do you get in the design of the stores?

Dennis Paphitis: Once an architect has my allegiance and loyalty they’re pretty much given carte blanche but they do need to earn it and they need to be respectful to keep it. With the guys in Paris, Ciguë, who are almost like some sort of contemporary experiment in architectural socialism, they’re extraordinarily hard working, committed and diligent, earnest and talented. Nothing with them ever runs on time, nothing runs to budget, nothing emerges in the way that you expect it to, but they pour their hearts into every job, see it through and remain responsible for the upkeep with an almost Victorian sense of propriety and dignity. I like this sense of responsibility.

We had hand-blown glass taps made by them for the Islington store, which exploded! But they will hand-blow them again and we’ve all learnt from that. It never regresses into a vulgar conversation around blame and who is responsible.

Conversely there are arrangements that we have in other parts of the world that are much more structured and sober and these are the ones that deliver at 10am on Monday 13th because that’s what’s been agreed. The work is still of a very high standard. I’m not sure if these have the same poetic capacity to arouse and to captivate, but it’s work that will certainly do its job and fulfil the brief. Personally it’s that little extra manic commitment and diligence that motivates and drives me so I enjoy this with people I work with.

Aesop Le Marais, Paris, by Ciguë

Above: Aesop Le Marais, Paris, by Ciguë

Marcus Fairs: Is your approach to hiring architects changing as the company grows?

Dennis Paphitis: What I’ve proposed is that we standardised the relationship that we have with some architects and make it a ‘marriage’ in specific regions. I’ve always worked on a “What if I get hit by a truck?” theory, so I am no longer involved in the commercial aspects of the company. My role is now more an arm’s length creative provocateur, just to kind of stir the pot a bit where I sense the design decisions being made are perhaps too safe and less energised than they might be. The truth is that many of my colleagues are far more visionary and driven than I am and have the capacity to develop and further explore the company’s next chapters.

Aesop store in Singapore by March Studio

Above: Aesop store in Singapore by March Studio

Marcus Fairs: Which store is your favourite?

Dennis Paphitis: I think the current personal favourite is always the most recent store because it’s like a new lover or something similarly engrossing. You become immersed in the moment but then they become like children and you could never admit to favouring one over the other.

Aesop, Rue Tiquetonne, Paris

We’ve just opened a fourth store in Paris in Rue Tiquetonne [above] and a sixth in London in Islington [below]. I think both of these are particularly interesting, they feel like a logical evolution of what we’ve explored with Ciguë to date. Earlier in the year we opened a little gem of a store in Collins Street, Melbourne designed by our creative team with Kerstin Thompson. The thinking behind that store was very much around speaking with men, because the location is in the banking end of town, there are lots of institutional clubs for men, bankers and the rest of it. The material references for this space are all quite sturdy, traditional yet at the same time a little subversive to an educated eye.

Aesop, Islington, London

Then we opened Geneva [see slideshow] three months ago. This one was intended to evoke more a decadent living room of maybe a central European or Middle Eastern undercover agent with an apartment in Geneva. There is extraordinary copper detailing and stuccoed plaster, quite beautiful matt, saturated skin toned walls, so that was also an interesting one.

And we also opened a second store in Zurich [see slideshow]. That was constructed largely out of cork. I’ve always been interested in cork because of the tactility and the acoustic qualities that it has. It’s a very small store though it has high visual impact and it’s been well received. Then Islington, which opened about four months or so ago. The reference point here was nurseries and seedling trays that you could slide open and close. Ciguë used a lot of plants, and since opening, the plants have quadrupled in size and grown all over the walls and products so this idea of a store never being quite finished or static is very much our thing.

We’re working with an interesting lighting firm in Beirut called .PSLAB. They’ve resolved a long-standing Aesop lighting dilemma, because our stores are generally quite under-lit by standard retail measures and they’ve managed to gently increase the lighting levels a little yet still keep it all soft and human and more living room like.

Épatant, Melbourne

Above: Épatant, Melbourne by Dennis Paphitis and Lock Smeeton

Marcus Fairs: You’ve set up a new retail concept for men. Tell me about that.

Dennis Paphitis: Épatant [above] is a separate non-Aesop project that I’m working on for a day a week. It’s intended as a kind of mental palette cleanser for me; a distraction that I can amuse myself with. I have a business partner on this project and we’ve been speaking-thinking for the last couple of years about the way men behave in a retail context, what switches them on, what engages them and what just closes them down.

It’s really just an edit of product that we like and already use and felt deserved a base to be presented from. Épatant means “dapper gent” in French and the idea was that we would have product that address all categories of a man’s life from birth until death, without necessarily touching fashion. Fashion is not something we know, and with sizes and seasons it just becomes too complicated and kind of tedious.

So there’s a website and a physical store and the idea is you can shop by brand and you can shop by category: fitness, wellbeing, personal grooming, car, office, outdoors, and so forth. Or you can shop by milestone, if you’re buying a gift for someone; birth, graduation, divorce, retirement, whatever it may be.

We share the space with some Japanese friends who have developed a food offer, thinking what does a guy want to eat for lunch? The options are quite limited in terms of food. It’s an interesting project. We also represent Aesop there because in the grooming category it was the only logical option. I generally spend four days a week working on Aesop and one day on Épatant, and I think it’s been constructive. One project fuels the other and keeps it interesting for me. It’s the first non-Aesop workplace thought I’ve had in twenty five years and I’m still trying to figure out what it all means.

The post “I was horrified at the thought of a
soulless chain” – Aesop founder
appeared first on Dezeen.

Interview: Nathan Zhang: We talk to the Beijing-based founder of Brandnü about his upcycled fashion operation

Interview: Nathan Zhang

Waste is one of the dark sides of development, especially in fast growing-country like China, and Beijing is no exception. With massive urbanization bringing crowds of mostly unskilled rural workers to the city and a literal ring of garbage dumps and unauthorized recycling centers besieging the capital, it’s often…

Continue Reading…

Artst Tlk: Pharrell Williams on curiosity and knowledge in a discussion about his new inquisitive video series

Artst Tlk

Pharrell Williams can easily be called a modern-day renaissance man. Already known as a gifted musician, producer, skateboarder and fashion designer, in his new video series Artst Tlk Williams subtly reveals himself as a highly capable conversationalist, asking some of contemporary culture’s finest minds a bevy of curious questions…

Continue Reading…

Lost Time by Glithero for Perrier-Jouët

Design Miami: inspired by Gaudí’s ingenious method to create the perfect curve, Anglo-Dutch design duo Glithero have hung loops of beaded chain over a shallow pool of water in an installation for champagne house Perrier-Jouët (+ slideshow).

Lost Time by Glithero for Perrier-Jouët

Founded by British designer Tim Simpson and Dutch designer Sarah van Gameren, London-based studio Glithero was asked by Perrier-Jouët to come up with a piece to reflect the champagne house’s art nouveau history.

Lost Time by Glithero for Perrier-Jouët

Lost Time is installed in a darkened room inside the Design Miami fair, stretching along a narrow corridor with a pool of water right beneath it.

Lost Time by Glithero for Perrier-Jouët

The elongated domes are reflected in the water below, hinting at the bubbles of a champagne glass.

Lost Time by Glithero for Perrier-Jouët

“We knew the affinity of Perrier-Jouët with art nouveau,” said van Gameren, explaining that they made the link with Gaudí’s architectural model for the art nouveau-influenced Sagrada Familia cathedral in Barcelona.

Lost Time by Glithero for Perrier-Jouët

“It was an upside-down model, and it was completely made of strings and little bags of sand to keep the string nicely poised,” continued van Gameren. “He mirrored it with a mirror underneath and used it as the basis for the structural fundaments of the Sagrada Familia.

Lost Time by Glithero for Perrier-Jouët

“That’s a really interesting thing – it’s also almost like a tool that creates curves, and in this time, in this day and age, you probably have a computer to fill this function. What’s really charming of course, is that he managed to do it so analogue,” she added.

Lost Time by Glithero for Perrier-Jouët

The designers also wanted to recreate the environment of the cellars in Epernay, France, where the champagne is made. “There is a really strange atmosphere in there because it’s a bit humid, moist, and the walls are all chalky because that’s where the grapes grow and all the bottles are stored there,” van Gameren explained to Dezeen at the opening of the installation.

Lost Time by Glithero for Perrier-Jouët

“We wanted to almost capture the timelessness that we had the impression there was in these vaults, or in these caves, and the reflections – because there were puddles on the floor and they reflected the ceiling, and spiderwebs with little dew drops. And it was almost like we wanted to take a little bottle and bring it here in Miami,” she added.

Lost Time by Glithero for Perrier-Jouët

The designers met and studied at the Royal College of Art in London and are also presenting photosensitive vases marked by strips of seaweed at Design Miami.

Other work by Glithero we’ve featured on Dezeen includes vases and tiles decorated with plants and a pair of self-supporting candles.

See more projects by Glithero »
See all our coverage of Design Miami »

Read the full interview below:


Emilie Chalcraft: How were you first asked to do this project and and how did you feel about working with a champagne house?

Tim Simpson: We were asked to participate with with Perrier-Jouët, and it began with a visit to Epernay to see how the champagne is made, which is exactly up our street because we’re so at home on factory floors and seeing processes and especially when they are as authentic as making champagne. So that’s how these things begin – you have to learn a lot about each other, and we learnt a lot about the heritage of their brand and how it’s made, and the environment. For us the most interesting part of that process was seeing the fermenting. Because it’s something that’s really a labour; it’s very slow.

Sarah van Gameren: It started in the summer more or less. One of the things we did was that we went to Epernay to go and visit the cellars. And there is a really strange atmosphere in there because it’s a bit humid, like, moist, and the walls are all chalky because that’s where the grapes grow on, and all the bottles are stored there. Every day they have to be flipped, because fermentation needs to sink to the other side.

And us being very interested in process, we find that kind of stuff a very interesting way to approach the brief, or, there was no brief, but the idea or the project. And we wanted to almost capture the timelessness that we had the impression there was in these vaults, or in those caves, and the reflection, because there were puddles on the floor and they reflected the ceiling. Spider webs with little dew drops. And it was almost like we wanted to take a little bottle and bring it here in Miami.

Because it’s an interesting atmosphere – it also gives you the feeling that time stood still, and this reflection that happens in nature – you know, the symmetry of an object hanging above and then being exactly reflected opposite – this, I think, very pensive moment makes you think or stand still and realise something, and yeah, these elements we wanted to really bring.

And part of that was also that we knew the affinity of Perrier-Jouët with art nouveau, and we knew one very interesting [element] in art nouveau was the model [by] Gaudi that he once made for the Sagrada Familia, because it was an upside-down model, and it was completely made of strings and little bags of sand to keep the string nicely poised. He used this image, he mirrored it with a mirror underneath and used it as the basis for his structural, sort of fundamentals of the Sagrada Familia. That’s a really interesting thing, it’s also almost like a tool that creates curves, and in this time, in this day and age you probably have a computer to fill this function. What’s really charming of course, is that he managed to do it so analogue.

Emilie Chalcraft: So what about the idea that art nouveau was an era where craft and process were quite important, did you think about those things as well?

Sarah van Gameren: I guess that is something that is very fitting in our studio mentality in general, you know? Our processes are, or our projects are very much about process, and about experimentation and about pushing to the borders of science. Our Blueprint project is a really good example of where, on the one hand, nature is really in play, and on the other hand it really pushes things that in the art nouveau era were also pushed, like glazes and so on. This case is really about exposure through UV light.

Tim Simpson: But there is also really a tangent there with our work and the work of the art nouveau, because in some ways we’re completely opposite. Because with the artists of the art nouveau, you really see that they wanted to make an interpretation of natural forms in a way that you’re very aware of the maker leaving their mark, and that’s actually quite opposite to our approach. We are somehow, you could say we’re a little bit hands-off, or we are often trying to sort of create distance between our hands and the things that we make.

Sarah van Gameren: And on the other hand, I find also that it has a more direct link to nature, because we use the direct specimen of the vases, but also in this work very much we show almost a sort of natural phenomenon of reflection and symmetry.

Emilie Chalcraft: Did the idea for the installation form itself quite quickly?

Sarah van Gameren: Yeah, it goes sort of back and forth and sometimes, because there are always so many ingredients in our work, every project has more layers than one – technical, but also conceptual.

Emilie Chalcraft: But compared to some of your other projects this one is really simple, there is less science, chemical reactions and all that kind of thing.

Tim Simpson: But what it did have though is some learning through experimentation and really practicing, and we were building a lot of mock-ups. Maybe in principle it’s simple, but actually how the light works is something that took a long time to develop. Because when you enter the space the light source is completely invisible, it’s only when you lean over – and there is a good reason for that, because if you do see any of the light itself your pupil dilates and it adjusts to – or closes, sorry – the reflection. If you try it actually, you can put a camera over and the camera works the same way and you can’t actually photograph the reflection.

Sarah van Gameren: Certain angles are much more effective, like if you go lower to the water surface you get much more effective angles, so we had to make it quite long. All these kind of things, it’s like, the usual materials we work with, like the plaster, has been replaced with immaterial materials like light, and there’s water of course. It’s completely different palette to use. But in a way we do the same thing again – it’s still about tweaking materials and trying to make them all come together in a particular moment in the most perfect way, but hands off.

Emilie Chalcraft: And the light is supposed to recreate the cellars and the darkness of the cellars in Epernay. There are plans to actually install Lost Time in the Perrier-Jouët cellars, right?

Tim Simpson: Yeah, well it’s naturally a very damp environment. Actually, this whole idea of reflection came from that experience of seeing the still puddles in the cellars, so it is there because the walls are chalk and they have moisture that is there. We’ve been before to do photo shoots to sort of put a focus on the things that inspired us, and we’ve already actually flooded the cellars, a really good day where we were taking gallons of water. I was really surprised they let us do it but they did, they let us really flood it, and we were taking these kind of completely mirrored images which were actually quite constructed, in a really fun way, but they were constructed. So those puddles are there, and I think we can actually go even further in the cellars because there is the length, and we had to do the length because it’s caves, it’s sort of corridors almost, and we know we can flood it. I think it’s really at home there, I think it would be really nice.

Emilie Chalcraft: So it could get extended to be even longer?

Tim Simpson: Yeah exactly, yeah.

Emilie Chalcraft: You were saying about process being important to your work. Slow design is quite a buzzword these days, and the idea of looking into craft and process more. Is that something you are interested in or align yourself with at all?

Sarah van Gameren: We’re not against production for royalties at all. At this moment our journey, or our path, was different somehow, but we can also really imagine treating industrial production in a very similar way to how we create our installations right now. It’s a different thing that holds things together with us. Like, the conceptual backbone has more to do with things like the transformation and the moment of the creation of something. And also, how you shift from an end product to the moment that you create something because it might have more value, and in a way this immaterial approach is also one of these, it’s a solution to that hypothesis in a way, you know?

Emilie Chalcraft: A lot of designers are now interested in designing experiences rather than objects, and this seems to be very much an experience rather than a tangible thing. Is it something you would want to do again?

Tim Simpson: Yeah we’re really at home in experiences. We like the idea of the timeline, or the idea that you can deliver something in a very controlled way or be the author of how you deliver an experience. So yeah, that’s maybe not such a tangible concept with something static, but actually there are ways that that is present in our work. So for instance, if you take one of the Blueware vases, there are cues that we leave behind that explain how that thing came into being, or cues like little pieces of tape.

Emilie Chalcraft: Yeah, I noticed that, I wondered why you kept those leftover marks from the sticky tape on the vases.

Tim Simpson: Yeah, we choose to sort of describe – it’s not something you see immediately but there is the hope, in how you interact with it, that there is a level of understanding that reveals itself. You can also do that in experiences, in spaces, you can be in control of timing. We have been talking about how there was this great moment when we hung the work, there was a moment when we filled it with water and everybody came in and sat there and saw the work just kind of appear as a drizzle that got bigger and bigger.

I realised afterwards that sort of genesis of the work, and it is there now, you can as a visitor disturb the water, and people have been doing that and it means that someone comes in and they encounter the thing maybe appearing or maybe disappearing, and in that respect it really works. Although, it would have been really cool to have just a drainage hole in the middle and have the thing constantly kind of drain and fill, or something that was disturbing the surface, because then you become really aware of its fragility.

Sarah van Gameren: That might be something for the next project, you know? Our projects tend to evolve, and it’s not like a one off, we in no way want to make one installational statement and then not do anything with that anymore. The next step would be to show this in a different scale and a different context, and yeah, maybe think of a product for example, things to keep going.

 

The post Lost Time by Glithero
for Perrier-Jouët
appeared first on Dezeen.

Interview: Jeremy Burke: We team up with Braun to talk to the comedian about his favorite Built to Perform possession

Interview: Jeremy Burke

Sponsored content: In a high performance world, Braun creates innovative designs built to last seven years. For the Built to Perform series Braun profiles 15 innovative guys in an intimate look at their life passions and the unique objects of design and durability that power their life. The creative idea…

Continue Reading…

Interview: Miraphora Mina and Eduardo Lima: We talk to the Harry Potter graphic designers about The Printorium

Interview: Miraphora Mina and Eduardo Lima

Launched in September 2012, The Printorium is the latest project by Miraphora Mina and Eduardo Lima, founders of MinaLima Design. Mina and Lima met on the set of the Harry Potter films and, after working for almost 10 years in defining the graphic identity of the saga from props…

Continue Reading…

“For us, Asia is in the centre” – Aric Chen

Aric Chen

News: Aric Chen, curator of art and design for the new M+ museum for visual culture in Hong Kong, says the museum will take an unprecedented stance in “placing Asia at the centre” of design history, rather than on the periphery as western curators have done (+ audio + transcript).

Above: listen to Aric Chen on his curatorial approach to Asian design at the new M+ museum in Hong Kong

“There are great museums that have great objects and items in their collections relating to Asia but that’s usually with Asia being sort of ‘other’, on the periphery,” Chen told Dezeen. “For us, Asia is in the centre and I think that’s a very different perspective than any other museum has taken.”

He was speaking to Dezeen after a talk at the Asia Society in Hong Kong on Monday, presenting the findings of a two-day workshop with leading international curators and scholars to explore the implications of historicising, collecting and curating Asian design. “We don’t have many precedents for design and architecture collections – certainly of any real size or scale – in Asia,” Chen explained, adding that M+ will strive to set its own approach apart from the curatorial models of long-established collections in Europe and the US.

“We will not be duplicating the efforts of other museums who are doing a very good job of what they’re doing: MoMA, the Design Museum London and the V&A all have great collections of architecture and design, and there’s absolutely no need for us to clone them,” he said. “That doesn’t mean that established models don’t have things we can learn from but our main priority is really to define who we are on our terms. I see our Hong Kong perspective as being something very organic, natural, and hence perhaps more authentic.”

M+ is set to open in 2017 as part of the new West Kowloon Cultural District, a 40 hectare site that will be masterplanned by Foster + Partners. Chen took up his post as curator of art and design a month ago, having previously been creative director of Beijing Design Week where he told Dezeen that “China needs to slow down” in our previous interview in October.

The Asian Design: Histories, Collecting, Curating talk was part of a series of workshops called M+ Matters, a series of public talks and workshops to shape the curatorial stance of the museum as its collection evolves ahead of opening. Speakers included Dr Christine Guth of the Royal College of Art/V&A museum in London on the baggage that comes with the term “Asian design”, and MoMA curator Paola Antonelli on new modes of design. All speakers’ papers will be available from the M+ Matters website soon.

Dezeen is in Hong Kong this week to report on Business of Design Week and you can see all our recent stories about Chinese design here.

Read the full transcript of the interview with Aric Chen below:


Rose Etherington: Can you explain what you’ve been trying to do [in Hong Kong] over the last couple of days?

Aric Chen: We have a very broad mandate, but a very complicated one in a wonderful way. We are trying to build a collection, and perhaps even a discourse, about design and architecture from both the 20th century to a contemporary standpoint, from our perspective here in in Hong Kong, China and Asia. Plus, as a museum for visual culture, including art, design, architecture and moving image, from an Asian perspective. But it’s not a museum of Asian visual culture.

We want to intelligently build this idea of design and architecture from our perspective here, but to do it in a way that avoids a lot of pitfalls that can easily come with that. We are not only questioning our identity, but the very notion of an identity. What does it mean to have an Asian perspective? What do design and architecture actually do? What are the parameters nowadays? What are the local global sort of issues that we have to deal with? This workshop for the past couple of days has really been a starting point. We’ve invited fantastic speakers from all over, all coming from a different angle themselves, different backgrounds, really to illustrate the complexity of the task at hand, but also of course to give us various starting points.

Rose Etherington: I would normally ask you what conclusions you have drawn over the last couple of days, but I think it’s maybe more relevant to ask what are the biggest problems that you’ve uncovered. What are the biggest questions?

Aric Chen: I think, well first of all, as for your first question, I think in general, we all have to accept that the only conclusion is that there is no conclusion. As I was saying earlier, all museums, or all good museums at least, are constantly evolving. They are constantly framing, reframing themselves with the questions they ask, and adjusting, revising, and reappraising their own standpoint. And I think we’ll be doing that too. But in terms of the biggest problems, I think the biggest is just really the immensity of the task at hand, but there’s a really easy solution, which is to take it one step at a time.

Rose Etherington: Do you have a kind list formed in your mind of what M+ must not do? What it must not be?

Aric Chen: What is first and foremost for me is that we will not be duplicating the efforts of other museums. So we are doing a very good job of what they’re doing, you know. Collection-wise, MOMA has a great collection, Design Museum London, VMA, they all have great collections of design and architecture and there is absolutely no need for us to clone them. That’s the biggest “don’t”, to sort of fall into this trap of following others, or following established models too closely. Now that doesn’t mean that established models don’t have things we can learn from, but our main priority is really to define who we are on our terms.

Rose Etherington: And is that where being based on a Hong Kong perspective comes in?

Aric Chen: Yes, and I’ll be frank, I don’t think we need to be getting into these sort of circular arguments of identity politics. I see our Hong Kong perspective as being something very organic, organic-natural, and hence perhaps more authentic. We are here, we are of this place, we are from this place and that will naturally show.

Rose Etherington: Do you think there is a lack of that kind of approach in museum curating at the moment?

Aric Chen: Well, it’s difficult to say because there aren’t, I mean, I just said that we don’t want to follow established models or precedence, but in some ways we don’t have a choice because we don’t have many precedents for design architecture museum collection, certainly of any real size or scale in Asia. So again, I think this Asian perspective will come naturally, we don’t want it to be a forced thing.

I think there are great museums that have great objects and other items in their collections from, of and relating to Asia, and again that’s usually with Asia as being the sort of other on the periphery. For us, Asia is in the centre. And I think that’s a very different perspective than any other museum has taken, I hope.

The post “For us, Asia is in the centre”
– Aric Chen
appeared first on Dezeen.