MGM Makes It Official: Files Demolition Request for Norman Foster’s Unopened Las Vegas Hotel

0209vegassmaller.jpg

MGM Resorts has finally made it official and have filed a demolition request for Norman Foster‘s unopened Harmon Hotel in Las Vegas, something they’d hinted at last month, and before then back in the fall of last year, and had likely started considering way back in 2009 when construction defects were discovered too late and the project had to be massively scaled down. The company is still viciously fighting in court with the general contractor, Perini Building, who they claim made a number of massive errors which caused unsafe, unstable conditions and resulted in an unfinished building that cost nearly $300 million but is still unusable. However, it’s that ongoing legal fight that may stall the demolition itself, for as long as the battle continues in court, the Las Vegas Sun reports that the county can’t authorize the building’s destruction, thus likely extending this whole story by at least another year or two. For their part, Perini Building, who will not sign on to exploding the Harmon, believes that MGM wants the demolition as soon as possible to help cover up evidence of the design errors that had plagued the project from the start. The company also believes that the building can not only be repaired, but that it is currently safe, disputing research funded by MGM that found much to the contrary. Should MGM be able to wrangle their way around the legal system and get the county to agree to bringing down Foster’s hotel, the Sun reports that the company expects the demolition to take roughly six months, with five more months following to remove all the rubble and return it to the vacant lot it once was.

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Details on Architect Will Alsop’s New Firm, ALL Design

0814Alsop.jpg

After saying the rumors were completely unfounded, architect Will Alsop recently once again pulled a 180 and did exactly what the rumors had foretold, specifically that he was leaving the massive Scottish firm RMJM to start his own new practice. Now Building Design has learned a few specifics of the new venture, which he’s launched with his longtime business partner, Scott Lawrie, who has been working with Alsop since their days toiling for Norman Foster. The new company will be called ALL Design and will call South London its home. Here’s a bit more about it from BD:

Up to 15 staff will be transferring across from previous practice Will Alsop at RMJM and will be based in the same Battersea studio which has been Alsop’s home through a number of incarnations. In all, the new firm will have 20 staff.

…“We are very happy to work on anything from a tea spoon to a city, sometimes in collaboration with designers from other fields,” Lawrie added.

The site also reports that Alsop will continue working with his now-former employer on several projects that were ongoing at the time of his exit.

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Abercrombie & Fitch Offers to Pay Jersey Shore‘s “The Situation” Not to Wear Its Clothes

An actual request or simply a publicity stunt? Either way, retailer Abercrombie & Fitch is getting some nice attention this week after a statement they released asking Michael Sorrentino, one of the stars of the reality television seriesThe Jersey Shore and who is most often referred to by his nickname, “The Situation”, to stop wearing clothing made by their company. And not only do they want him to stop, but they’ve offered to pay him not to wear their clothing. According to the Wall Street Journal, after a staffer saw an episode of the hit MTV show wherein Serrentino was wearing a visibly-branded A&F shirt, CEO Mike Jeffries decided this might damage “the aspirational nature of the brand” and cooked up the scheme to try to pay to end it. Though Jeffries also added, “We’re having a lot of fun with it,” explaining that the whole thing might not be entirely serious. Here’s the company’s full statement:

We are deeply concerned that Mr. Sorrentino’s association with our brand could cause significant damage to our image. We understand that the show is for entertainment purposes, but believe this association is contrary to the aspirational nature of our brand, and may be distressing to many of our fans. We have therefore offered a substantial payment to Michael ‘The Situation’ Sorrentino and the producers of MTV’s The Jersey Shore to have the character wear an alternate brand. We have also extended this offer to other members of the cast, and are urgently waiting a response.

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

With ‘The Steepest Decline in Billings Since February 2010′, AIA’s Architecture Billings Index Fall Again

Last month, we opened with a quote in the headline of a post, “It can’t get any worse — and then it does.” An apt statement indeed, as the American Institute of Architects has just released the sobering news that, for the fifth straight month, the Architecture Billings Index has dropped once again. Indicating increases and declines in billings within the industry (anything above or below 50, respectively), the Index fell more than a full point, down to 45.1, resulting in “the steepest decline in billings since February 2010.” Here’s a bit from the AIA’s resident numbers expert, who sounds as if he’s also dropping points and sliding down the Glum Index:

“Business conditions for architecture firms have turned down sharply,” said AIA Chief Economist, Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. “Late last year and in the first couple of months of this year there was a sense that we were slowly pulling out of the downturn, but now the concern is that we haven’t yet reached the bottom of the cycle. Current high levels of uncertainly in the economy don’t point to an immediate turnaround.”

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Huffington Post Catches Heat for Spec-Based Logo Design Contest

The Huffington Post receives more than a bit of criticism about its journalism practices, but recently it found itself in a different sort of boiling kettle, enraging the anti-spec work crowd. The site recently launched a contest to design a new logo for their political wing, HuffPost Politics. Users would submit logos and the winner would see their branding used “all over the interwebs.” The sticking point, of course, is that a) they were digging for free design and b) so free that said winner wouldn’t even ever see a dime for their work. Given that the Huffington Post is now owned by the AOL empire, a company with a few dollars behind it, the whole thing stuck in the collective craw of those who find spec work appalling. AntiSpec heeded the call by requesting that people speak out against the contest, which resulted in hundreds of comments blasting the site on the contest’s page, an even greater number of conversations about it on social networks, and media pickups from the likes of AdWeek, Politico, and Forbes, all in the space of roughly 24 hours. Ultimately, HuffPo backed down, closing the contest early and releasing something that sort of vaguely resembles an apology, but in the eyes of AntiSpec, doesn’t quite go the distance: “I find HuffPo’s statement a little blah in all honesty.” Feel free to judge for yourself, as here’s the site’s official pull-away from the contest:

We asked fans of HuffPost Politics to submit suggestions for social media icon designs as a fun way of enabling them to express their passion for politics — and for HuffPost. As readers of our site know, we frequently engage our community with requests for feedback and suggestions. So while AOL Huffington Post Media Group employs an in-house team of more than 30 talented designers, we felt this would be a lighthearted way to encourage HuffPost Politics users to express another side of their talents.

Though they also make mention that readers should “stay tuned to see the competition finalists in the coming days,” so perhaps they’re just closing down early to quiet the angry buzz and will just pick a winner from the stash they’d already received.

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Kardashian Sisters Accused of Handbag Design Theft by Monica Botkier

We fully realize that by talking about the Kardashian family we’re only continuing to give them the power they require to keep existing, and for that we apologize. However, we promise in this post to discuss something that only paint them in a potentially negative light, namely allegations of design theft. Late last week, designer Monica Botkier filed a post on her eponymous company’s blog entitled “K is for Knock-Off.” Botkier alleges that the new Kardashian Kollection, which features pieces designed by three of the family’s sisters and was recently launched at Sears, includes a handbag that looks remarkably similar to one of their own, the “Botkier Clyde.” From two side pouches to the diagonal zippers to even the frilly extras hanging here and there, you’d be hard pressed not to see the similarities. In response to the theft complaint, the Kardashian’s issued a statement, which the Hollywood Reporter has in full. In it, they fight back on three fronts: 1) that they have not yet received a cease and desist letter (which we read as “if we haven’t gotten one, how for real could all of this be?”), 2) that their potential-copycat bag was “independently created” and is not yet available for public consumption (or “we just licensed our name out, so our hands are clean, and since the bag wasn’t available anyway, it will make it more difficult for you to sue us”) and lastly, 3) pointing fingers and saying that Botkier’s a thief too (here’s that quote: “[Parent company Jupi] was also surprised by Botkier’s statements in the media about purported ‘knock offs’ of Botkier handbags in light of other comments in the media noting the similarity of Botkier bags to preexisting Balenciaga bags”). So a dirty fight, yes, but it appears to possibly already be over, as Sears has already “removed the bag from their website.”

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

A Full Recap on the Savage Success of the Met’s Alexander McQueen Exhibition

Now that it’s nearly been a full week since the “Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty” closed at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the full reports on the triumphant, record-setting success it was for the museum are starting to come out. First, the Met issued a full total count of visitors who passed through the exhibition: a whopping 661,509, placing it at number eight in their Top 10 list of most popular shows they’ve ever had in their 141-year history. Among that nearly three-quarters of million people, it’s been announced that 23,000 wound up signing up for memberships somewhere along the way, which go from anywhere between $70 and $550. As the Wall Street Journal writes, this being more than double the amount who signed up last year over the same period of time, is sure to give the museum a nice boost, particularly in the face of continued rocky financial times. However, it wasn’t all good news in the membership department. DNAinfo reports that a letter was sent out this week to all members, apologizing that they’d stopped letting them cut in line this past weekend while the museum was thronged with last minute visitors, which sometimes resulted in lines lasting up to five hours just to get into the exhibit. “Our goal throughout this period of high demand was to balance our commitments to access and safety, for both our visitors and our collections,” wrote director Thomas Campbell in his conciliatory letter. But in the end, it’s assumed that even though those last minute straggling members were miffed, they still stayed put and stuck it out. Finally, Jezebel recently took a look at the numbers, did some analysis, and came up with a rough estimation of how much the Met raked in over the short run of the exhibition: $14,603,862. Not too shabby at all. Though one can assume that some of that was eaten up a bit with the overhead of hiring more security, paying staff overtime and just leaving the museum open for so many additional hours (cooling that building down with A/C certainly can’t be cheap).

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Christian Louboutin Denied Injunction Against Yves Saint Laurent Over Red Soled Shoes

This week marked the end to year another lawsuit between two heavy hitters, this time around between two fashion giants. You might recall that back in April, shoe designer Christian Louboutin took to court both Yves Saint Laurent and Brazilian label Carmen Steffens over their selling of shoes that featured red soles. Given that Louboutin’s major claim to fame were his own red soled product, which he had patented in the late 1990s, his company wanted singular ownership. By the end of last month, though it was still anyone’s guess how the case would pan out, the good money was against Louboutin winning. And so he has not. This week, Federal District Court Judge Victor Marrero denied the designer’s injunction against YSL, stating that all though he owned the aforementioned patent, the request to block all merchandise based on a color was simply too broad to accept. This not only clears YSL from having to continue fighting and possibly scrapping entire product runs, but assumes that other brands, like Carmen Steffens, will be safe as well. Here’s a bit from the Judge’s ruling (which is well worth reading in full if you’d like a quick, interesting crash course in fashion intellectual property law):

In sum, the Court cannot conceive that the Lanham Act could serve as the source of the broad spectrum of absurdities that would follow recognition of a trademark for the use of a single color for fashion items. Because the Court has serious doubts that Louboutin possesses a protectable mark, the Court finds that Louboutin cannot establish a likelihood that it will succeed on its claims for trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Act. Thus there is no warrant to grant injunctive relief on those claims.

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Locals only: I’m hiring some helping hands!

I am looking to hire some students to help with the assembling, making, collating, stuffing and other handiwork required for various UPPERCASE projects. Projects include preparing envelopes of goodies, assembling handmade books, button-making and other hands-on tasks as required throughout the year. Work will begin immediately and be concentrated in August and once the school year begins, it would be on a per project or as-needed basis. Please email me if you are interested. janine at uppercasemagazine dot com.

Please note this is for local Calgarians, with preference given to students. Most work will happen in the UPPERCASE studio downtown.

Desktop Publishing Software Company Quark Acquired by Platinum Equity

Following yesterday’s news of Say Media acquiring Remodelista, this is shaping up to be the week of design-based buyouts. Early yesterday, the Denver-based publishing software company Quark announced that it has been acquired by the California-based private equity firm, Platinum Equity. Like with most purchases, the promise is immediately made that everything will stay relatively the same, thus appeasing dedicated users. “This wasn’t an exit play; it was a very specific opportunity to find an investment partner,” Quark’s CEO told the Denver Business Journal, who went on to write that “the deal won’t change Quark’s headquarters location, executives or employment numbers.” However, even with these reassurances, just the mention of an “exit move” indicates how Quark has struggled after losing its dominance in the publishing and design market to Adobe over the past decade, which seemed to have knocked it off its bearings to a considerable degree (DesignInfo has a great, quick overview of how the company has fared over the past 10+ years). Whether or not this new management can turn things around and head the company in the right direction is anyone’s guess, but it will be interesting to see how it all pans out regardless. Here’s a bit from Quark President and CEO, Ray Schiavone, in his letter about the acquisition:

As a global investment firm, Platinum Equity is well-positioned to help us continue to execute our dynamic publishing vision through their market reach, merger and acquisition experience, and operational support. Just as importantly, the firm shares Quark’s commitment to our customers. This is the natural next step in Quark’s evolution.

On behalf of the entire Quark team, I want to thank you once again for the relationship we have built and for your continued confidence in our capabilities. We look forward to earning that trust each and every day.

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.