The shape of a 3D printer is easy to envision: “Form follows function” dictates that they all have rigid parts aligned in the X-, Y- and Z-axes that the print head will travel along. But a fellow named Jon Wise is tinkering with an alternate design that uses radial arms rather than a grid-based Cartesian system of plotting, making his mock-up look less like a box and more like a drawing machine.
“Standard 3D printers require significant mechanical structure to provide movement on the three axes,” writes Wise. “This alternative design uses radial arms with a minimum of mechanical engineering.” If 3D printers were all designed this way, assuming the pieces had the appropriate rigidity, they could use less materials in their construction and, through clever design, be made more portable. Sure there’d be more calculations required for plotting, but Wise farms that out to the diminutive, inexpensive Raspberry Pi computer board:
This brains-over-brawn approach is intriguing. It would be neat if it not only folded up, but if there were little laser sensors hooked up to a processor that could constantly make microadjustments to the stepper motors to compensate for slop in the parts. If even a clumsy craftsperson could slap one of these together, and a computer brain did the heavy lifting in terms of calculations, it could open up a lot of possibilities for bringing precision production to areas where precision is in short supply.
     |
Post a Comment