“Office buildings tend to be very boring” – Richard Rogers

In our next movie focussing on the work of Richard Rogers, the British architect talks exclusively to Dezeen about the challenges of designing an interesting office building and explains how the new Leadenhall building in London, dubbed “the Cheesegrater”, got its distinctive shape.

"Office buildings tend to be very boring" - Richard Rogers
Richard Rogers of Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners. Photo copyright: Dezeen

The Leadenhall building is a new 225-metre skyscraper by Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners in the City of London, which topped out in June and is due to be completed in 2014.

Positioned opposite Richard Rogers’ famous Lloyd’s building, the 50-storey office building features a glazed body that is tapered on one side – hence its popular nickname.

Watch a time-lapse movie documenting the construction of the Leadenhall building »

"Office buildings tend to be very boring" - Richard Rogers
Render showing Leadenhall building as it will look when completed in 2014

Office buildings, Rogers admits, “tend to be very boring”. The key to creating the Leadenhall building’s distinctive angular form, he says, was creatively working with the constraints of the site.

“One of the arts of architecture is to use constraints, turn them upside down and see whether they can help you to design the building,” he explains.

"Office buildings tend to be very boring" - Richard Rogers
The Leadenhall building’s tapered shape is designed to preserve views of St Paul’s Cathedral

“The main constraint on Leadenhall was the view to St Paul’s [Cathedral]. London is unique in being partly controlled by views; you have to leave certain views open to St Paul’s and we were on one of those views. So we made use of this and we cut it back at an angle and that gave us that prominent section and profile, [which can be seen] from all over London.”

"Office buildings tend to be very boring" - Richard Rogers
Leadenhall building under construction. Photograph by Dan Lowe

The Leadenhall building’s criss-crossing steel frame will be displayed prominently through the external glazing. Rogers claims that this has an important role to play in giving the building scale.

“The building itself expresses its system of construction because it’s one of the things in which we get scale,” he says. “Scale is critical. Height and length have limited use. You can make a building immensely large and overbearing, which is basically a single storey, or you can make a building which is very light and it’s got fifty storeys. How you break it down is critical.”

"Office buildings tend to be very boring" - Richard Rogers
Leadenhall building under construction. Photograph by Paul Raftery

Rogers claims that many of the ideas that informed his earlier buildings, such as placing the mechanical services on the outside of the building, are also present in the Leadenhall building. However, the nature of changing technology means that they are implemented in different ways.

“The elements which we’ve got to know well we’re using here,” he says, pointing out the banks of elevators located on the back of the building. “We are using a lot of flexibility obviously. So we’re using that but in a way that, more or less forty years after Pompidou, is very much machine-made.”

"Office buildings tend to be very boring" - Richard Rogers
Leadenhall building under construction. Photograph by Paul Raftery

He adds: “We thought Lloyd’s was the absolute ultimate in the art of technology. When I look at it now, it’s handmade practically. We had [a few] pieces [built] off-site. Leadenhall is all built off-site.”

Rogers says he enjoys the contrast between the two buildings, which stand in such close proximity to each other but were built nearly 30 years apart.

"Office buildings tend to be very boring" - Richard Rogers
Render showing how the banks of elevators at the rear of the building will look

“It’s very exciting to see the dialogue between these two, and actually, I think it’s really exciting to see the dialogue between Lloyds of London, Leadenhall and the dome of St Paul’s in the background, of a totally different period,” he says.

“To me that’s what architecture is all about. It’s not about fitting in, it’s setting up these dialogues. The enjoyment of St Paul’s was that it was seen against a very low and rather poor medieval background. That was a flourish. It’s exactly the same with any form of architecture. It’s a dialogue, it’s a beauty that comes from contrast.”

"Office buildings tend to be very boring" - Richard Rogers
Render showing Leadenhall building as it will look when completed in 2014

Rogers was speaking to Dezeen to mark the opening of an exhibition called Richard Rogers RA: Inside Out at the Royal Academy of Arts in London.

Watch our previous interview with Rogers about the exhibition »
See our earlier story about the exhibition »

The post “Office buildings tend to be very
boring” – Richard Rogers
appeared first on Dezeen.

Allowing greenfield development would “wreck” London – Richard Rogers

Richard Rogers, photo by Andrew Zuckermann

News: relaxing planning restrictions on the green belt would destroy London’s vitality “even more surely than it would despoil the countryside,” architect Richard Rogers has warned.

“I do not say this as a rural nimby, though I treasure England’s natural landscape, but as a defender of cities,” writes Rogers in the London’s Evening Standard newspaper, arguing that the city’s mix of jobs, shops, restaurants, parks and nightlife acts as “a magnet to people from across the globe.”

“Letting the city sprawl would undermine this mix and intensity, reversing the rebirth of city-centre living,” he warns, saying suburban sprawl not only leads to “social atomisation” but becomes “environmentally disastrous” as car journeys displace public transport.

To solve the UK’s housing crisis, architects, planners and developers “need to show ingenuity” by redeveloping thousands of hectares of brownfield land as well as empty offices and houses across the country – but simply converting buildings is not enough, he argues.

“It will not create homes or communities unless intelligent urban design and planning also create the schools, shops and public transport hubs civilised life demands.

“And why should we rush to convert office blocks when we already have three-quarters of a million homes in England lying empty, and sites with planning permission for 400,000 more?”

According to homeless charity Shelter, the government’s plan to build 150,000 “affordable” homes – priced below market rates – over four years will provide less than a third of what is needed, with over 1.7 million households currently on local authority housing waiting lists.

UK planning minister Nick Boles recently called for an area of countryside twice the size of Greater London to be built on in order to solve the growing housing crisis.

In the US, New York mayor Michael Bloomberg last year announced plans for “micro-unit” apartments to help solve the shortage of small homes in Manhattan, while San Francisco city chiefs have voted to allow the development of apartments as small as 20 square metres.

Rogers’ firm recently completed a set of six-sided apartment blocks beside the Tate Modern art gallery in central London – see all projects by Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners.

Photograph by Andrew Zuckerman.

The post Allowing greenfield development would
“wreck” London – Richard Rogers
appeared first on Dezeen.