voxeljet Concept: The First Continuous 3D Printer

voxeljet_concpet.jpeg

If there ever was a major leap in the evolution of the 3D printer, the voxeljet Concept is the benchmark machine to follow. In the explosive arena of start-ups that produce innovative 3D-printers, voxeljet has decided to challenge and change the direction of how 3D printers work. Taking a look at three specific factors that set this process apart from others on the market, it becomes quite clear just how revolutionary this concept is.

  • The ability to have a continuous supply of consumables delivered to the machines as it is making a model. This is made possible because the bed of consumables sits above where the models are actually made.
  • The printhead sits in an area that it tilted at about a 35 degree angle with a printhead resolution of 600 DPI.
  • The build size 800mm x 500mm x Infinity. As the model is being printed it sits on a conveyor belt that delivers the model out at the other end.

At a layer thickness of 150 to 400 microns, the resolution is decent when compared to others 3D printers but it is worth noting that this is still in the concept phase so there is the possibility to improve the layer thickness.

Continuous 3D-Printing Technology represents a new dimension in the manufacturing of moulds and models without tools. With its big advantages compared to conventional standard-3D-printers VX concept is a pioneer for a whole new generation of machines. The length of the moulds is virtually unlimited with this type of system as there is no restriction to the length of the belt conveyor. The usable build length is only limited by the manageability of the moulds. Furthermore, the tilt of the print level enables the print head to take far less time for positioning movements, which improves the print speed. Apart from the technological highlights, users will be pleased with the investment and operating costs because they are lower than those of conventional systems. With the continuous printing system, there is no need for a build container or separate unpacking station, which has a positive effect on the purchase costs. The printer also scores points with its high re-use rate for the unprinted particle material, which is returned straight to the build zone from the unpacking area. Consequently, the machine requires smaller filling quantities and incurs lower set-up costs.

Check the promo vid after the jump…

(more…)


And Now, a CNC-Milled, Honeycomb-Filled Wooden Surfboard

MikeGrobelny-Alaia-lead.jpgMikeGrobelny-Alaia-GoPro.jpg

It’s been almost exactly two years since New Zealand-based ‘maker’ Mike Grobelny first set out to make an alaia and over a year since he posted his accomplishment in an extremely thorough time-lapse video, but it’s worth a belated post because the project is as relevant as ever. Not to mention the fact that it’s pretty awesome.

The surfboard (and culture of surfing) represents conflict between industry and the environment. The physical act, and the culture of surfing, provides an intimate connection with nature and natural forces. It is this emotional and physical engagement with nature that makes the surfing experience powerful and enriching for many people. In direct contrast to this natural experience is the use of toxic materials in the manufacture of surfboards, with negative impacts for both board manufacturers and the natural environment. These toxic synthetic materials provide a high level of performance, which most surfers are looking for and is not easily achieved using natural materials.

The combined aesthetic of the surfboards beautiful form and natural materials, moves the surfboard from a relatively short-lived disposable sport product to a treasured artifact, increasing its inherent value and challenging the disposable mentality prevailing in current surf-culture.

MikeGrobelny-Alaia-detail.jpg

MikeGrobelny-Alaia-fisheye.jpg

I can’t speak to the ins-and-outs of surfing—much less their fabrication by hand—which is precisely why we appreciate Grobelny’s painstaking documentation. It’s not quite an Instructable, but credit to the Aucklander for putting the video together:

(more…)


Objet of Desire (and Ire): A 3D-Printed Scale Model of Fenway

0objetfenway001.jpg

To celebrate the 100th anniversary of Boston’s Fenway Park, Objet used one of their Connex 3D printers to crank out a replica of the stadium, created from blueprints and photographs:

(more…)


Feedback Friday: Solidoodle’s Sam Cervantes Sets Record Straight on Desktop 3D Printing Resolution

0solidoodle2.jpg

Thanks to our readers who sounded off, following our post on the low-cost Solidoodle 3D desktop printer, on their experiences with such machines. For a first-time buyer, it can be confusing as to what the machines’ exact capabilities are, and a little shared info can go a long way into helping the rest of us make the right buying decision.

“I think the largest misconception would be that all of these are turn-key machines,” reader Shane Johnston pointed out. “I’ve needed to tweak temps on the bed and extruder, wall thickness, layer thickness and speed for each print to get decent results out of the Replicator. [But] coming from a history with other printers like the Z-Corps, I actually like this level of control.”

Additionally, reader JDB pointed out that while the Solidoodle typically prints at a layer height of 0.3mm, it can actually be set to go as low as 0.1mm. And Solidoodle user Ian Johnson mentions that “I would think that all of the hobby printers have the same capabilities when it comes to resolution. The differences will be speed, and accuracy. The rigid metal case helps with accuracy.”

Best of all Sam Cervantes, the founder of Solidoodle—who clarified some of the technical points on their website following our post—helpfully contacted us to illuminate some of the murkier points of 3D printing resolution. As Sam explains:

(more…)


Add Pensa’s DIWire Bender to Your DIYer Arsenal

Pensa-DIWireBender-Logo.jpgPensa-DIWireBender-wide.jpg

Our friends at Brooklyn-based consultancy Pensa have worked with the likes of Johnson & Johnson and McDonald’s—not to mention ID idols OXO—but their multidisciplinary team has still found time to come up with independent projects such as the “DIWire Bender.”

The DIWire Bender is a rapid prototype machine that bends metal wire to produce 2D or 3D shapes.

Simply draw curves in the computer, import the file into our software and press print. Our software can read vector files (e.g., Adobe Illustrator files), Rhino or Wavefront OBJ 3D files, text files of commands (e.g., feed 50 mm, bend 90° to right…) or pure coordinates (from 0,0,0 to 0,10,10 to….). All inputs are automatically translated into DIWire motor commands. During the print, the wire unwinds from a spool, passes through a series of wheels that straighten it, and then feeds through the bending head, which moves around in 3 dimensions to create the desired bends and curves.

What could you use a DIWire for? Wire models are often needed in design, whether they are for furniture (chair leg scale models) or housewares projects (wire baskets) or even engineering parts (custom springs). But why stop at prototypes? The machine can read any data, why not output artwork from a random number algorithm, or internet data like stock prices and weather stats. You can create mass customized products, like eyeglass frames that fit, or be a street vendor printing jewelry from a person’s silhouette, on demand. And it doesn’t have to be aluminum wire; in principal the machine could bend other materials, including colored electrical wires, some plastics, memory metals, even light pipes to create small light forms. And if you don’t like the output, it could be configured to pass the bent wire through the straightener to start again.

Pensa-DIWireBender-2up.jpg

Pensa-DIWireBender-detail.jpg

The DIWire Bender is Pensa’s answer to the rapid proliferation of other rapid prototyping technologies, such as 3D printers and CNC machines; indeed, the tabletop device is a variation on the latter.

In recent years, 3D rapid prototyping machines have gone mainstream. And we’ve been excited to see 3D printers spreading beyond businesses to individuals, with the aid of a little DIY ingenuity (e.g., Makerbots, RepRap, etc.). All these machines work on the same principal—to create a form, they split a volume into thin slices, and build up the form by printing a layer of material and bonding it to the next. The main difference between the build technologies (SLA, SLS, FDM and others) is the material and the bonding methods.

But there are times when we need to output lines in space rather than volumes. Most 3D printing technologies are not well suited for printing thin lines because the materials are weak, the machine uses a lot of 3D-print support material, and the process is slow. The closest thing to a machine that can output lines is a CNC wire bender, but these machines are used almost exclusively for mass production in factories. They are not used for rapid prototyping because the equipment is large, expensive and takes trained personnel to run. So, we decided to make the DIWire Bender.

Pensa-DIWireBender-products.jpg

The concept, then, is fairly straightfoward, but it still makes more sense when you see the video. The first clip shows the machine producing a simple ‘pound’ sign, as well as a fairly complex distended helix:

(more…)


The Solidoodle: A Low-Priced 3D Desktop Printer

0soildoodle.JPG

There’s been online buzz about the Solidoodle, a forthcoming desktop 3D printer and competitor to MakerBot’s Replicator. Part of the buzz is that Sam Cervantes was once MakerBot’s COO, before breaking off to do his own thing in 2010; the other part of the buzz is that the Solidoodle starts at $499, a fraction of the Replicator’s $1,749 price tag.

So will the Solidoodle eat MakerBot’s lunch? Well, not so fast; the articles we’ve seen neglect to mention some important-to-designers technical differences between the two machines.

While the build areas of each machine are close—the Solidoodle allows 6″ x 6″ x 6″ construction versus the Replicator’s 8.9″ x 5.7″ x 5.9″—that extra three inches in the Replicator’s X-axis will be the deciding factor for those that need to make longer parts.

The other distinction is in the resolution, both vertical and horizontal. The Solidoodle’s Z-axis minimum layer height is 0.3mm, whereas the Replicator can get it down to 0.2mm. And in the X/Y axes the resolution of the Solidoodle is 84dpi, whereas the Replicator’s X/Y resolution is higher.

Just how much higher, however, is frustratingly not revealed. MakerBot claimed their earlier Thing-O-Matic machine had a resolution “approximately as good as a 300 DPI printer,” and a Times article subsequently alluded to the Replicator having a higher resolution than that; but the actual number is nowhere to be found on MakerBot’s site.

Lastly, I should point out that your correspondent is going off of fact sheets here and has never used either of these machines. For those of you experienced with desktop 3D printers, I’m guessing there are a lot more factors than resolution and build area that would influence which machine you’d choose—perhaps the machine’s accuracy, versus printed resolution, or wait times. The Solidoodle’s not on the market yet, but for those of you with Replicator experience, what do you think are the salient points a first-time buyer ought to be concerned with?

Until we hear your responses, here’s a (rather underproduced) video of the Solidoodle:

(more…)


Using Digital Manufacturing to Create a Condiment Mystery

0vortexs&p.jpg

It’s frustrating when something’s clever but you don’t know exactly how it’s clever. The ceramic Vortex Salt & Pepper Shakers, designed by
a Frankfurt-based team of ID’ers using digital manufacturing by Shapeways, fit that bill perfectly: Each has only one opening in the top, which is how you load them. But when you invert them to dispense, only a measured pinch of salt or pepper escapes.

So how did they do it? Presumably there are some tricky, possible-with-digital-manufacturing-only channels inside the container that we’ll never get to see, unless we buy one of these just to break ’em open.

Says the design team, who collectively go by the handle Moloko,

[Looks] simple—but getting it right was tricky. Because designing a salt and pepper shaker for Shapeways has two big constraints: the design rules for hollowed ceramics demand an opening with a diameter of at least 10mm—but there is no food safe material available on Shapeways to make a plug for this hole.

So we had to come up wih a one-piece plugless solution: This shaker is conveniently filled from the top, through it’s big funnel-shaped opening. Obviously nobody wants all of the stuff to fall out again when using the shaker. We created a really simple but effective retaining system that lets the shaker be filled easily but keeps the condiment inside when you turn the shaker upside down. Only a pinch of condiment will leave the shaker when shaking it slightly, just like it should be.

(more…)


Kickstart port rhombus design’s Digital Ceramics Studio

rhombus_1.jpeg
Matt Kennedy is an ambitious young product designer graduating this year from the University of Oregon. Besides being an awesome intern for our Portland-based Hand-Eye Supply store, Matt established a small studio two years ago called port rhombus design that explores the intersection of craft practices and digital tools.

Help Matt launch his product design studio by realizing a first edition production run of his beautifully crafted “digital ceramics.” In his pitch video, Matt gives us an incredibly articulate pitch on the importance of supporting independent designers as well as the way home manufacturing can push the boundaries of design.

“I believe that cottage industry production will lead to more meaningful, responsible, and unique product innovations in the near future,” Kennedy explains. “The advent of affordable home manufacturing machines can propel indepdendent designers and craftsmen capabilities, as well as level the playing field for larger manufacturers who arent always as responsible or innovative in their practices.”

(more…)


How Laser Cutting Machines are Made

0lasercutterstrm.jpg

If only there was a way to combine my love of metalworking with my laser proficiency

Here’s something we don’t see often: A “How it’s made” video showing how they make something that makes other things. Specifically, a laser cutting machine.

The coolest thing we didn’t know before seeing the video is that a laser beam must be the appropriate shape in order to cut optimally, just like a router bit or a kitchen knife designed for a specific task. But the laser used here is invisible, and you can’t shape what you can’t see. So check out 2:10 in the video where they use clear blocks of sacrificial plastic that actually reveal the laser’s shape.

(more…)


The ShapeOko: Inventables’ Desktop CNC Machine

0shapeoko.jpg

Looks like the Makerbot’s finally got some company, if not direct competition: Inventables is now taking pre-orders for their own desktop fabrication machine, though this one is subtractive rather than additive. Called the ShapeOko, it’s a DIY, open-source CNC milling machine that rings in at $999 for a complete machine (some assembly required). For now it’s being sold sort of Kickstarter-style—Inventables needs 150 pre-orders to start the manufacturing run by a predetermined deadline or everyone’s money gets refunded.

The ShapeOko can mill metal, plastic or wood, with a working area of nearly 8″ by 8″ in the X/Y axes and 3.5″ in the Z. Here’s designer Edward Ford introducing the machine:

Here’s the machine in action:

(more…)