The Death Star vs. Florida and Other Photorealistic Scale Comparisons

We’ve all seen charts like the following, which indicate how tall one thing is in relation to another:

And you’ve undoubtedly seen a photo of, say, some tiny electronic component with a quarter placed in the photo for scale. But college student and Photoshop wiz Kevin Wisbith has a different way to present relative size. “I’ve seen a lot of images just cut out and placed side by side,” he writes on Reddit, “and it just isn’t as impressive to me. Being able to see [objects compared] in a real life environment just does so much more for me.”

To that end, here are some shots from his “A Quick Perspective: Sizing Up Reality” series.

The Titanic. When it was built the Titanic was one of the largest ships built. It’s total length was 882 feet and 9 inches long. Since then ship building has come a long way. The United States aircraft carrier the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan is 1,092 feet long. If the Titanic was placed on the deck of the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan the ship would have 210 feet of deck room left.
The 2.6 Trillion Dollar Rock. The Dionysus asteroid is part of the Apollo asteroid belt. The Dionysus asteroid is estimated to be 1.5 km wide or 4921.26 feet. The value of the resources estimated to be within the asteroid is around $2,600,000,000,000. If the asteroid was placed above the Golden Gate Bridge, it wouldn’t even surpass the bridge span.
The Pulmonoscorpius kirktonensis or (Breathing Scorpion). Prehistoric bugs were larger than average day bugs due to the higher oxygen levels. The Pulmonoscorpius kirktonensis was a species of scorpion that grew to 24 inches long, or the size of a normal house cat. Personally, I’m glad I these things don’t exist anymore. I’d never go outside ever again if they did.
The Mir Mine. The Mir Mine located in Russia is one of the deepest mines in the world. The official depth is 1,722 feet deep. If the 2nd tallest building in the United States, the Willis or Sears Tower which is 1,729 feet tall was placed in the mine, the tip would only stick out 7 feet past ground level.
B-2 Bomber. The B-2 Bomber is one of the worlds most advanced and most expensive airplanes in the world. What most people don’t realize is how big these things really are. The wingspan of a B-2 is 172 feet which is 12 feet wider than an NFL football field.
Worlds Largest Oil Tanker. The largest oil tanker ever produced was the Seawise Giant which spanned 1,504 feet. If placed in the main lake in New York’s Central Park it would only have 350 feet of extra room on the front and back.
Burj Khalifa. The Burj Khalifa is currently the tallest standing structure in the world. It measures in at 2,722 feet tall. If placed in New York it would stretch almost 1,000 feet past the One World Trade center and almost 1,300 feet taller than the Empire State Building.
The Death Star. Although the Death Star doesn’t exist in reality, it’s truly the biggest and most bad-ass machine ever conceived. The Death Star’s estimated width is around 99 miles across, or around 1/4th the length of Florida.

Note that the captions are Wisbith’s. The wording on the last one is a little weird; he seems to imply that the Death Star never existed, when many know that it did but that Rebel forces successfully destroyed it, as recorded in a 1977 George Lucas cult documentary. In any case, Wisbith has also created video installments of the series that can be viewed here.

Via Kottke

Sound by Human: A multi-functional, futuristic device for audio, biometrics, spoken translation and more

Sound by Human

At first glance, Sound by Human is unlike any listening device on the market. Seeking to reinvent both headphones and earphones, they felt the ideal form factor was in between the two; their on-ear design is a bit unconventional, as is the range……

Continue Reading…

The Awesome Imaginary Bang&Olufsen Catalog

Sten Speaker Unit A

What’s better than a hi-fi speaker? Loads of them! The students at Aalto University put together form explorations for Bang and Olufsen’s audio division. The great part is that each speaker looks incredibly different, having no connection with one another, but they still look like Bang and Olufsen speakers. I guess it’s all in the anti-speaker form language, and the choice of material, primarily wood, metal, and fabric. Which one’s your favorite??

Designers: ​Masters Candidate of Collaborative and Industrial Design – Aalto University

Sten Speaker Unit C

BeoSound Cuisine A

BeoSound Cuisine C

BeoSound 50 A

BeoSound 50 C

Model n°0 A

Model n°0 B

Reflect A

Reflect C

loud_exhibition_11

Belong A

Belong C

BeoLab S A

BeoLab S C

How to Recognize a Great Client

As helpful as school can be, there are many topics design programs fail to breach—particularly in the realm of operating within the professional sectors of the design world. 

On our discussion boards, Core77 moderator Mr-914 recently brought up an apt point about a subject no design student would predict they need to know in their future. Mr-914 writes:

“Louis Sullivan said, “Great architecture requires great clients” or something close to that. This weekend, I was thinking about this in a moment of design rage and it dawned on me. I’ve never had a class, seen a lecture or read an article on how to get or even recognize great clients. I was hoping the collective C77 board intelligence could help me out. Any clues? 

One example I have is an architect once told me about when his office got successful enough to start turning clients away. He had a client that just kept insisting for bad design in their million dollar house project and after 2-3 meetings the architect told them he wasn’t their man.

The problem with that is that it depends on judgement based on hundreds of client meetings. Even then, he had to burn 8-12 hours on preparation and meetings just to turn the job down. Are their signs we can depend on earlier?” 

Here are some words of advice from our fellow discussion board members that may be helpful to any freelancers or agencies in this predicament:

If the brief is vague, stay away

“The clarity of [the potential client’s] brief can be taken under consideration. The more vague, the more I’d stay away. But I have never seen a design firm at 100% capacity. And instead of turning away customers, they will add capacity before they hit critical mass. Maybe it’s different for the architecture folks, but those guys take themselves way too seriously.” iab

Beware the “Inventor” 

“The greater the instance on an NDA, the greater likelihood the idea is crap and not worth it. I’ve had billion dollar brands work with me with no NDA (obv. they have big lawyers) and ‘inventors’ want a 10 page NDA and more signed.” – rkuchinsky

“Sometimes your gut reaction is the best indicator. I took a lot of jobs and would argue that most of them were with terrible clients. ‘Inventor’ types who watched shark tank too much and insisted because they had already spent money on patents that their ideas would be worth millions, and were not open to any changes or improvements. Just wanted somebody to ‘CAD it up’ or ‘make it look prettier’…Ultimately you will need to spend some time with them to get a sense of their level of arrogance and demands, and even then until you actually start negotiating a real statement of work the craziness might not come out. The best thing you can do is plan deliverables and payments in a way that minimizes your risk, and gives you an exit strategy if you need to jump ship.” – Cyberdemon

Good clients are knowledgable about NPD…

“You either know the NPD [New Product Development] process or you don’t. Bad clients will tend to be the ones who don’t know and will say ‘I need to launch.’ Good clients will know the process and be specific about where they are in the process and what they need at that time. ‘We see this opportunity and need to to run some ideas by our customers.'”- iab

…But listen to your gut—you shouldn’t necessarily rule the others out

“Gut feel has a lot to do with it. I actually work a lot with startups, new brands and people not experienced in the process. It’s given me a different attitude to client and process management. They hire me because I do what I do, and they can see the value in it.” — rkuchinsky

Basic “dos” and “donts”

I don’t take projects where I think I can do great design, but will ultimately sit on shelf because the client has no money for development or getting to market.
I don’t take projects where I know I will be not seeing eye to eye on the process or design.
I don’t take projects where my value is not recognized by the client, regardless of if they pay me what I’m looking for.
I don’t take projects where I think the idea is stupid and even if they can get to market.
I don’t take projects if they don’t need me, or need so much more than me that I wouldn’t make a difference to the end result.
I don’t take projects if I can’t get paid.
I don’t take projects only for the money no matter how much, if that’s the only thing going for it.

…..

I do take projects I think I can do good work on.
I do take projects that I think are a good idea by a good person I can work with.
I do take projects that challenge me and provide me with an opportunity to do something new or get involved in a different area or skill.” — rkuchinsky

Share your thoughts—do you agree with these tips? Have any advice of your own? Client horror stories? Contribute to the discussion in the comment feed below, or chime in on our original discussion board post

The Shortest, Best-Designed Presentation We've Ever Seen

As designers we often have to present our work, whether through presentation boards, renderings or physical models. The highest achievement of this art form is if you can express a complicated concept that the viewer can grasp in seconds–and it’s even better if you can do it wordlessly, eliminating any language barrier.

This simple demonstration put on by U-Haul at the recent Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance Conference might be the best-designed presentation we’ve ever seen. Their task was to demonstrate how the weight distribution on a loaded trailer affects driving dynamics. To do it, they used an RC Ford Mustang running on a treadmill:

<div contenteditable="false" id="b882eb_6388" class="embed_wrapper large clear_both" data-twitter-embed="

Great demo by @uhaul today @CVSA Conference shows affect of weight distribution on trailer #weightforward #trailer. pic.twitter.com/veefMuWC4v

— OPCVC (@OPCVC) September 22, 2016

“>

Credit: This video was shot by the Ontario Police Commercial Vehicle Committee.

The principle is easy to grasp and provides more data than, say, having a bystander witness an actual trailer crash:

Link About It: The Features of Google's Pixel Mobile Phone

The Features of Google's Pixel Mobile Phone


Who wouldn’t like a phone that recuperates seven hours of battery life after 15 minutes of being plugged in? And that’s just one of many features Google has announced regarding their new mobile phone Pixel, for which they built both the software and……

Continue Reading…

The froth is strong in this one!

fika_frother_1

Coffee’s supposed to energize you… but is it possible for a coffee frother to calm you down first? The Fika is a rather meditative looking electric milk frother that’ll agitate your milk, but soothe your nerves. It comes with a rather geometric body, calming pastel colors, and a pretty negligible learning curve. Slide the sleeve up to power on, and back down to power off. Or should I say slide the sleeve up to ensure your coffee is deliciously creamy enough to leave a milk mustache on your lip!

Designer: Sue Xian Hor

fika_frother_2

fika_frother_3

fika_frother_4

fika_frother_5

fika_frother_6

Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen

L’architecte et designer américain Michael Jantzen est à l’origine de cette maison modulable en bois, portant le nom de The Malleable Autonomous Retreat House. L’ingénieuse demeure conçue par le natif de Centralia, dans l’Illinois, possède en effet des murs, un toit et de nombreux détails ajustables en fonction de la position du soleil et de la volonté de ses occupants. Un projet innovant et minutieux, dont vous pourrez apprécier les détails dans la suite de l’article.

Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-19
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-18
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-17
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-16
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-15
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-14
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-13
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-11
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-10
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-9
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-8
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-7
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-6
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-5
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-4
Incredible Malleable House by Michael Jantzen-1

Bloomberg Has a Tronc-Gannett Update

Et tu, “Gronc?”

That has been the sentiment among media watchers in the wake of Ken Doctor’s Sunday evening report for Politico Media that an announcement of Gannett’s acquisition of Tronc was imminent. Today, Bloomberg reporters Alex Sherman and Matthew Monks challenge that timetable:

Gannett Co. and Tronc Inc. have bridged a valuation gap that caused months of friction, but are still hammering out the details of a transaction, people familiar with the situation said.

The parties haven’t reached a final agreement, and an announcement isn’t imminent, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the matter is private. Gannett, the owner of USA Today, is in talks to buy Tronc for $18.50 to $19 a share, the people said.

One aspect of Doctor’s article that we’ve been pondering. He wrote that at the time Tronc chairman Michael Ferro got L.A. billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong to invest, he promised in return he would not sell to Gannett.

Previously on FishbowlNY:
Gannett: From Royal Soper to Tronc
Outcry Over Reassignment of Tronc Suburban Newspaper Reporter Grows
Tronc Newspaper Crunched by Tronc Flier

Vice Has Its Own Beer Now

Screen Shot 2016-10-04 at 3.22.36 PMVice Media has an idea: While your reading a rad Vice article, why not enjoy a rad Vice beer?

Old Blue Last (named after the London bar that Vice owns) is Vice’s first beer. It’s five percent ABV and made by Blue Point Brewery in Long Island.

According to Vice, OBL is “gose-influenced, a little sour, a little salty, and perfect for cracking open in your living room, at your favorite music venue, or on your best friend’s rooftop.” Oh man. That is so cool.

OBL will hit store shelves in Manhattan and Brooklyn over the next few weeks. It’s going to be wild.