Here’s one more infographic for the books. We get a kick outta GOOD’s latest effort which makes one wonder if in fact nihilism is a widespread epidemic in our culture (given the over-exposure of one particular recent event, that is).
Color cupboard
Posted in: UncategorizedType On Fire
Posted in: Ruslan KhasanovSpécialisé dans la conception graphique et la création d’identité visuelle de marque, Ruslan Khasanov a imaginé cette typographie tout en flamme “Au Revoir”. D’une très grande qualité, ce dernier maîtrise à merveille les effets des flammes pour un rendu très impressionnant.
Previously on Fubiz
Copyright Fubiz™ – Suivez nous sur Twitter et Facebook
“Thanks for the free day off”
Posted in: UncategorizedThe Dezeen office is closed today due to the royal wedding but here’s a link back to our story from January about a series of unofficial souvenirs commissioned by London communications and creative agency KK Outlet.
State Department’s Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations Wants Better Designed US Embassies
Posted in: UncategorizedIf the US Department of State has their way with things, newly built American embassies will look and function much more attractively than those that have come before. The Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations, which reports directly to the State Department, has announced this week that it plans to renew its commitment to the agency’s “Design Excellence” program it implemented 16 years ago, but has apparently lapsed a bit on over the past few years. The tenants of the new program, which includes things like “moving away from low-bid contracting to a best-value approach, looking at total life-cycle costs” and making sure everything is LEED certified from top to bottom, can be read about in this attractive, but very government-speak PDF. For the quick rundown, we recommend reading this report from Engineering News-Record and then following along after ground is broken on a new embassy in London in 2013 and the program is hopefully moving at full-steam.
New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.
Keith Haring Collaborator and Art in the Streets Contributor, Angel Ortiz, Sentenced to 45 Days in Prison for Graffiti-Related Charges
Posted in: UncategorizedYesterday when we wrote that we might have to start up a feature reporting on the recent arrests of artists or the people connected to them, we maybe should have talked about it being more regular than on a mere weekly basis. Following the previous nabbings of Space Invader and Revok, another street artist whose work is currently showing as part of Los Angeles’ Museum of Contemporary Art‘s controversial Art in the Streets exhibition has been arrested. This time around, it was Angel Ortiz, also known as LA II. However, differing from the previous two, who were caught tagging in LA, Reuters reports that Ortiz was in New York and had already been detained by police at the time of the exhibition’s opening, after having been caught for the third time in March for vandalism. This week, the friend of LA MoCA’s director Jeffrey Deitch and former collaborator with the likes of Keith Haring and Basquiat, was sentenced this week to 45 days in prison for his offending graffiti. If there’s any light at the end of the tunnel, at least the sentence includes “the month already served,” giving Ortiz ample time to catch the exhibition baring his work out in Los Angeles.
New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.
Manuel Herz Architects of Basel have designed this Centre for the Jewish Community in Mainz, Germany covered in glazed, green ceramic tiles.
The shape of the building is abstractly based on the Hebrew word for blessing and is curved around a public courtyard.
The centre houses a synagogue, office spaces, school rooms a multipurpose space.
The interior walls of the synagogue are covered in densely packed Hebrew letters, in some areas arranged into poetry by 10th century rabbis.
The following is from the architects:
Jewish Community Center Mainz: מאור הגולה – Light of Diaspora Mainz
Few Jewish communities used to surpass the one of Mainz in importance and tradition. During the Middle Ages being the major center of religious teaching, this importance can be traced back to a series of influential Rabbis, especially Gershom ben Judah (960 to 1040) whose teachings and legal decisions had impact on Judaism at large. His wisdom was deemed to be so large that he was given the name “מאור הגולה“ – ‘Light of Diaspora’. The new Jewish Community Center of Mainz attempts to draw out this tradition.
The history of the Jews of Mainz though, has also witnessed a different side. In almost no other city have Jews been persecuted so often throughout history, and have still time and again attempted to build up a Jewish com- munity as in this so seemingly serene city of Mainz. Since the first mention of Jews in ‘Magenza’ around the year 900 the communities have been eradicated in a tragic regularity. And still, a few years later Jews found the courage to settle again in Mainz. Thus, almost paradigmatically Mainz embodies hope, learning and an unshakable belief in a future, and at the same time the destruction of Jewish culture and people over more than one millennium.
After the Holocaust the community is founded again by a small group of Jews. Up until the 1980s approximately 75 Jewish families are living in Mainz when immigration of Jews from the former Soviet republics increases this number sixfold. The existing spaces in a small residential building cannot fulfill the demands of the growing com- munity for religious, social and cultural activities anymore. A new building for a synagogue plus community center becomes necessary, constructed on the site of the former main ‘Synagogue Hindenburgstrasse.’
The Building and its Urban Context
In order to integrate the Jewish community center into the residential neighborhood of the “Mainzer Neustadt”, dating back to the late 19th century, the ‘perimeter block pattern’ (Blockrandbebauung) dominant in the area is used as an urban concept. The volume of the building is situated parallel to the streets and its facades are in line with the existing neighboring buildings, thus creating a contained street space. The use of the urban figure of the perimeter block pattern for the building, highly unusual for religious buildings, also questions the position of sacrality within the urban context. By orienting the part of the building housing the synagogue towards the East two squares or open spaces are created: An internal garden for the community offering room for recreation and celebration and a public square in front of the main entrance oriented towards the city center and offering an open space to the neighborhood within a densely built-up urban fabric. The absence of any kind of gating or barriers means that this square has become a truly public space that is used for everyday activities by the general public, rare for a religious building, especially for a synagogue, in Germany.
The urban context is dominated by high residential buildings of six to eight floors, that are marked by a firm and solid appearance. As the program for the synagogue and community center demands its main functions to be lo- cated on ground floor, the building rises to significant heights for reasons of functional or spatial quality, otherwise remaining low. Thus a volume is shaped that continiously alternates between high and low points, thereby formulat- ing an urbanistic response to its context. The precise articulation of this profile is informed by the theme of writing and its relationship to space.
In its history Judaism has never developed a strong tradition of building. Nor has it developed architectural styles that, as is the case in other religions, try to translate certain values and credos into built space. Instead, writing could be seen as a replacement for spatial production in Judaism. Specifically the Talmud, written after the destruc- tion of the second Temple and the beginning of Diaspora, can be viewed as a response to the loss of Jerusalem as Judaism’s central place, and as an alternative spatial model. The dimension of the architectural traverses throughout the whole Talmud, from the content of individual chapters, via its method of redaction, to the techniques of argu- ing and debating of the Rabbis in its pages. Also on the level of individual words and letters, an object quality is expressed in the writings. The Hebrew word for ‘word’ (דבר – Davar) has the additional meanings of thing or object. This object quality of writing, as well as the concept of the Talmud (which found its central place of learning in the city of Mainz) as a notion of space inform the design of the Jewish community center of Mainz.
Qadushah is the Hebrew word for raising or blessing, whose five characters in an abstracted way articulate קדושה the profile of the building. With the pronouncing of a blessing a profane object is raised or exalted. It is lifted out of the quotidian and made into something special. It is this act of making special that the building, in its everyday use, should allow for. The glazed ceramic facade points to a different layer of writing and scripture. Similar to a process of inscription or carving a pattern of a rippled and three-dimensional surface is formed with ceramic tiles. This pattern is arranged in a concentric way around the windows thus creating a perspectival play of dimensionality. Multiple perspectives with the windows being their vanishing points emerge within the building’s facade. This spatial quality is enhanced by the transparent green glazing of the ceramic tiles, which reflects the shifting light conditions of its surroundings and displays a wide array of hues and shades.
The synagogue is accessed through the main foyer. The organization of a synagogue space is usually characterized by a certain inner contradiction: Synagogues are on one hand oriented and directed towards East or Jerusalem. On the other hand, as the reading of the Torah is performed from a central position in space and from the midst of the community, emphasis lies on a centralized space. This inherent contradiction is spatially resolved by a horn- like roof that distinctly orients the space towards the East, but bringing the light right into the center of the space, falling exactly onto the position from where the Bible is read. The horn references the ‘shofar’ (ram’s horn) which, going back to the prevented sacrifice of Isaac by his father Abraham, symbolizes the connection and trust between mankind and the divine.
The interior surfaces of the synagogue are shaped by densely packed Hebrew letters forming a mosaic-like relief, though creating no semantic content. In certain areas this density of letters is reduced, the letters rearranged, and text becomes readable. ‘Piyutim’ (religious poetry) written by the rabbis of Mainz from the 10th and 11th century are carved into the surfaces of the synagogue. In an almost ‘Brechtian’ language these Piyutim narrate the love for the Torah in allusion to the ‘Song of Songs’ or the events around the destruction of the community during the first crusades, and reference the central role of Mainz for Judaism.
Furthermore, the Jewish community center houses office spaces, school rooms and two apartments as well as the multipurpose space of the community. This multipurpose space represents the social and cultural heart of the community and will be used for internal purposes as well as for public events for and by the whole city.
The Community
Jewish communities in Germany are often marked by the desire not to raise much attention with their activities. They play only a minor role in the social and cultural live of a city. This synagogue, in a city of one of the most important Jewish communities, tries to help develop a different consciousness. The new synagogue is a building that with confidence marks a new active place on the map of the city. It wants to attract the inhabitants of the city, Jews as well as non-Jews, for them to participate in its religious, social and cultural activities. It is a building that will raise attention, maybe questions, doubts, interests or maybe even anger, but also hope. First and foremost it is a building that will help make the Jews of Mainz into a visible and active part of society and link them with their rich history. In Germany, a country where synagogues always also have a political relevance, this building shows the power of Diaspora.
Project Information
Client: Architect: Project Team:
Project Management: Site Supervision: Landscaping: Structural Engineering: Ceramic Facade Planning: Electrical Engineering: Building Services: Building Physics:
Fire Services: Acoustical Planning: Total Floor Area: Building Costs: Completion:
Jewish Community Mainz Manuel Herz Architects, Basel and Cologne; Manuel Herz Construction Design: Elitsa Lacaze; Hania Michalska, Michael Scheuvens, Peter Sandmann; Concept Design: Cornelia Redeker, Sven Röttger, Sonja Starke Mainzer Aufbaugesellschaft mbH Klaus Dittmar Architekt, Mainz Harald Heims, Mainz Arup GmbH, Düsseldorf Niels Dietrich Keramikwerkstatt, Cologne K. Dörflinger GmbH, Allendorf House of Engineers, Mainz IBC Ingenieurbau Consult GmbH, Mainz Ingenieurbüro Ingo Petry, Mainz Ingenieurgesellschaft für Technische Akustik, Wiesbaden 2.500 qm approx. 6.0 Mill. Euro September 2010
See also:
.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Jewish Museum Extension by Daniel Libeskind | Jüdische Museum Munich by Wandel Hoefer Lorch | Meditation House by Pascal Arquitectos |
Moody sculptural paintings by an emerging NYC artist


Stark yet colorful works that fall somewhere between painting and sculpture, NYC-based artist Eli Ping’s practice is a study of unexpected tension in form, subject and tone. Ping says he’s “ultimately interested in materials and process, and accomplishing a form that conveys energetic resonance to the viewer,” a feat accomplished by keeping spontaneity alive in otherwise highly-considered compositions.
This ruminative approach to art-making shows up in his current solo exhibition at NYC’s Susan Inglett Gallery, but also signals a shift. Where he previously worked heavily with resins, Ping found that their toxicity was a “major impediment to accomplishing intimacy” with his materials and switched to applying paint-soaked cotton to canvas.


The resulting fluid shapes have a sense of order without appearing overly worked—a tipping point for Ping. If a piece becomes too “fussy,” he will often flip it over or turn it upside down, a technique borrowed from Impressionism. Ping explains, “they would often paint over an entire area, some people would say that is a waste of energy but even if it’s not visible, it still informs the work.”
A painting resembling a classic Rorschach test clearly illustrates Ping’s labor between intention and impulse. While symmetry abounds, he likens the unbalanced composition’s structure to that of nature. Repetition develops organically without feeling forced, the result of a process that, like contemporaries such as designer Maarten Baas, lets ideas evolve over time.


A photo of a church steeple shot through a drinking glass several years ago, now appears as a “stretched from the top” form in some of his sculptural pieces. Ping stresses that he doesn’t set out to replicate what he sees, adding “I have a sense of what qualities I aspire to, usually in response to a feeling of lack in a previous piece. Any pre-envisioning doesn’t go farther than that.”
Looking to the future however, Ping says his work will fall more in line with his simplified lifestyle. Moving forward he will create pieces that, unlike his current complex and often quite fragile works, need not “to be handled with kid gloves” and can instead become a part of a person’s life, rather than just hung on a wall.
Eli Ping’s third solo exhibition runs through 4 June 2011 at Susan Inglett Gallery.